From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH 3/3] swsusp: improve freeing of memory
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 22:14:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051113211409.GD2119@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200511122124.42675.rjw@sisk.pl>
Hi!
> This patch makes swsusp free only as much memory as needed and not as much
> as possible.
Looks okay to me. ACK, modulo few small things.
> -
> /* References to section boundaries */
> extern const void __nosave_begin, __nosave_end;
>
> extern unsigned int nr_copy_pages;
> -extern suspend_pagedir_t *pagedir_nosave;
> -extern suspend_pagedir_t *pagedir_save;
> +extern struct pbe *pagedir_nosave;
> +
> +/*
> + * This compilation switch determines the way in which memory will be freed
> + * during suspend. If defined, only as much memory will be freed as needed
> + * to complete the suspend. Otherwise, the largest possible amount of memory
> + * will be freed.
> + */
> +#define OPPORTUNISTIC_SHRINKING 1
Can you use little less tabelators? Also shorter name for this one
might be "FREE_ALL".
> +/*
> + * During suspend, on each attempt to free some more memory SHRINK_BITE
> + * is used as the number of pages to free
> + */
> +#define SHRINK_BITE 10000
Does this really need this kind of visibility? There's nothing user
should tweak here.
> /**
> + * On resume it is necessary to trace and eventually free the unsafe
> + * pages that have been allocated, because they are needed for I/O
> + * (on x86-64 we likely will "eat" these pages once again while
> + * creating the temporary page translation tables)
> + */
> +
> +struct eaten_page {
> + struct eaten_page *next;
> + char padding[PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(void *)];
> +};
Less tabelators here, please...
--
Thanks, Sharp!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-13 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-12 20:13 [RFT][PATCH 0/3] swsusp: improve freeing of memory Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-12 20:19 ` [RFT][PATCH 1/3] swsusp: remove encryption Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-12 23:42 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-12 20:22 ` [RFT][PATCH 2/3] swsusp: introduce the swap map structure Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-13 21:16 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-13 22:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-12 20:24 ` [RFT][PATCH 3/3] swsusp: improve freeing of memory Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-13 21:14 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-11-13 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051113211409.GD2119@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox