From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965065AbVKOWzK (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:55:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965066AbVKOWzJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:55:09 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:1412 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965065AbVKOWzH (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:55:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:54:51 -0800 From: Paul Jackson To: Mel Gorman Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, mel@csn.ul.ie, mingo@elte.hu, lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20 Message-Id: <20051115145451.671a29ec.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20051115164946.21980.2026.sendpatchset@skynet.csn.ul.ie> References: <20051115164946.21980.2026.sendpatchset@skynet.csn.ul.ie> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm sure you've stated this before, but could you repeat it? What's the driving motivation for this, and what's the essential capability required? -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401