From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] userland swsusp
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:32:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051115233201.GA10143@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051115222549.GF17023@redhat.com>
Hi!
> > This is prototype of userland swsusp. I'd like kernel parts to go in,
> > probably for 2.6.16. Now, I'm not sure about the interface, ioctls are
> > slightly ugly, OTOH it would be probably overkill to introduce
> > syscalls just for this. (I'll need to add an ioctl for freeing memory
> > in future).
>
> Just for info: If this goes in, Red Hat/Fedora kernels will fork
> swsusp development, as this method just will not work there.
> (We have a restricted /dev/mem that prevents writes to arbitary
> memory regions, as part of a patchset to prevent rootkits)
If this goes in, you can still keep using old method... I'll not
remove it anytime soon.
> Even it were not for this, the whole idea seems misconcieved to me
> anyway.
...but how do you provide nice, graphical progress bar for swsusp
without this? People want that, and "esc to abort", compression,
encryption. Too much to be done in kernel space, IMNSHO.
Pavel
--
Thanks, Sharp!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-15 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-15 21:29 [RFC] userland swsusp Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 21:32 ` [linux-pm] " Greg KH
2005-11-15 22:03 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-15 22:25 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-15 23:32 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-11-15 23:40 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-16 8:56 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-16 4:35 ` Dumitru Ciobarcianu
2005-11-16 6:14 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 6:00 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 16:50 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 19:57 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 21:35 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 22:47 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:53 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-23 10:16 ` Lorenzo Colitti
2005-11-23 12:02 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-19 9:32 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-19 23:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 19:36 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-18 21:18 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-18 21:20 ` Greg KH
2005-11-19 23:43 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-20 21:48 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-20 22:09 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-21 11:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-21 14:19 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-18 21:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-18 22:07 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-19 4:18 ` Jesse Barnes
2005-11-19 8:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-18 23:34 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-16 16:10 Gross, Mark
2005-11-16 16:44 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 20:20 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 22:05 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-16 21:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-16 22:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-16 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-17 17:02 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 19:57 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:12 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 20:20 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:37 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 20:46 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:59 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 20:54 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 21:01 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 21:06 ` Chris Wright
2005-11-17 21:14 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 21:18 ` Chris Wright
2005-11-17 21:45 ` Diego Calleja
2005-11-17 21:09 ` Matthew Garrett
2005-11-17 21:16 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-17 20:47 ` Lee Revell
2005-11-16 22:10 ` Greg KH
2005-11-16 21:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-11-17 7:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-16 19:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-17 16:54 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 16:44 ` Greg KH
2005-11-17 17:03 ` Patrick Mochel
2005-11-17 17:31 ` Olivier Galibert
2005-11-17 20:15 ` Jacek Kawa
2005-11-17 21:56 ` Greg KH
2005-11-18 17:41 ` Jacek Kawa
2005-11-18 23:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-17 18:50 Starikovskiy, Alexey Y
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051115233201.GA10143@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox