public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	pluto@agmk.net, john cooper <john.cooper@timesys.com>,
	Benedikt Spranger <bene@linutronix.de>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>,
	Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
	George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.14-rt13
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:40:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051116084037.GC14829@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <437AABFF.2010405@cybsft.com>


* K.R. Foley <kr@cybsft.com> wrote:

> >  - big RCU torture-test update (Paul E. McKenney)
> 
> In case anyone else makes the same mistake I did. If you are using the 
> same config from a previous build, you may have RCU_TORTURE_TEST=Y 
> (not module) and not even know it when running RT patches. You will 
> however definitely notice it if you use the config to build a non RT 
> kernel like 2.6.15-rc1. The previous RT patch defaulted 
> RCU_TORTURE_TEST=y. By the way, the fact that I didn't even notice 
> that the torture test was running with the RT kernel is a true measure 
> of how well things have progressed. :-)

yeah - i left it on by default, i usually do that with new debugging 
features, to give new code more exposure. In other words, mass 
distributed RCU stress-testing by stealth ;-)

I'll make it default-off once the RCU related changes have calmed down.  
The rcutorture kernel threads run at nice +19 so they should be barely 
noticeable. (except for a sudden and unexplained spike in the world's 
power consumption, and the resulting energy crisis ;-)

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-16  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-15  9:08 2.6.14-rt13 Ingo Molnar
2005-11-15 16:36 ` 2.6.14-rt13 Mark Knecht
2005-11-15 19:57   ` 2.6.14-rt13 Paul E. McKenney
2005-11-16  3:48 ` 2.6.14-rt13 K.R. Foley
2005-11-16  8:40   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-11-16 17:02     ` 2.6.14-rt13 Paul E. McKenney
2005-11-18 18:02 ` 2.6.14-rt13 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-11-18 21:54   ` 2.6.14-rt13 Lee Revell
2005-11-18 22:05     ` 2.6.14-rt13 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-11-18 22:07       ` 2.6.14-rt13 Ingo Molnar
2005-11-18 22:15         ` 2.6.14-rt13 Lee Revell
2005-11-18 22:25           ` 2.6.14-rt13 Steven Rostedt
2005-11-18 23:36             ` 2.6.14-rt13 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-11-18 23:57               ` 2.6.14-rt13 Steven Rostedt
2005-11-18 22:41         ` 2.6.14-rt13 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-11-19  2:39           ` 2.6.14-rt13 Steven Rostedt
2005-11-24 15:07             ` 2.6.14-rt13 Ingo Molnar
2005-11-24 15:21               ` 2.6.14-rt13 Steven Rostedt
2005-11-25 20:56               ` [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching to idle_poll (was: Re: 2.6.14-rt13) Steven Rostedt
2005-11-26 13:05                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-29  2:48                   ` [RFC][PATCH] Runtime switching of the idle function [take 2] Steven Rostedt
2005-11-29  3:02                     ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-29  3:42                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-29  4:01                         ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-29  6:44                           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-29  6:55                             ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-29 18:05                             ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 14:19                               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-29 14:50                                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 15:42                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-02  1:27                               ` Max Krasnyansky
2005-12-02  1:45                                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-03  2:17                                   ` Max Krasnyansky
2005-11-29  4:22                         ` john stultz
2005-11-29 14:22                           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-29 13:08                     ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-18 15:26                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-18 22:13       ` 2.6.14-rt13 Lee Revell
2005-11-18 22:32         ` 2.6.14-rt13 Vojtech Pavlik
2005-11-19  2:28           ` 2.6.14-rt13 George Anzinger
2005-11-19  7:45             ` 2.6.14-rt13 Vojtech Pavlik
2005-11-19 18:27               ` 2.6.14-rt13 Lee Revell
2005-11-21 21:32 ` 2.6.14-rt13 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-11-21 21:41   ` 2.6.14-rt13 john stultz
     [not found]   ` <20051121221511.GA7255@elte.hu>
2005-11-21 22:19     ` test time-warps [was: Re: 2.6.14-rt13] Ingo Molnar
2005-11-21 23:08       ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-11-21 23:38       ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-11-21 23:41       ` john stultz
2005-11-22  1:31         ` Lee Revell
2005-11-22  1:15       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-22 11:16         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-22 17:49           ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2005-11-22 18:01             ` Christopher Friesen
2005-11-22 18:22               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-11-22 20:52                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-11-22 11:19   ` 2.6.14-rt13 Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051116084037.GC14829@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=bene@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=john.cooper@timesys.com \
    --cc=kr@cybsft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=pluto@agmk.net \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox