From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 02/02] USB: add dynamic id functionality to USB core
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:25:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051117162533.GB26824@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0511171049070.5089-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 10:55:33AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> A few minor comments...
>
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > +static ssize_t store_new_id(struct device_driver *driver,
> > + const char *buf, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + struct usb_driver *usb_drv = to_usb_driver(driver);
> > + struct usb_dynid *dynid;
> > + u32 idVendor = 0;
> > + u32 idProduct = 0;
> > + int fields = 0;
> > +
> > + fields = sscanf(buf, "%x %x", &idVendor, &idProduct);
> > + if (fields < 0)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Don't you want to test (fields < 2)?
No, it's ok to just specify the vendor, if you want a product of 0 :)
PCI does it this way too.
> > + if (get_driver(&usb_drv->driver)) {
> > + driver_attach(&usb_drv->driver);
> > + put_driver(&usb_drv->driver);
> > + }
>
> Here you don't have to refer to &usb_drv->driver; you can just refer to
> driver.
Good point, changed, thanks.
> > +static int usb_create_newid_file(struct usb_driver *usb_drv)
> > +{
> > + int error = 0;
> > +
> > + if (usb_drv->probe != NULL)
> > + error = sysfs_create_file(&usb_drv->driver.kobj,
> > + &driver_attr_new_id.attr);
> > + return error;
> > +}
>
> This deserves to be an inline function.
>
> > +static void usb_free_dynids(struct usb_driver *usb_drv)
> > +{
> > + struct usb_dynid *dynid, *n;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&usb_drv->dynids.lock);
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(dynid, n, &usb_drv->dynids.list, node) {
> > + list_del(&dynid->node);
> > + kfree(dynid);
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock(&usb_drv->dynids.lock);
> > +}
>
> This could be inline as well, although being longer, its overhead is less
> noticeable.
It's just not worth it to inline these, it's not speed critical at all.
I prefer to not inline stuff unless it help out somehow.
thanks for the review,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-17 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-17 0:30 [PATCH 00/02] [RFC] Add dynamic id support to all USB drivers Greg KH
2005-11-17 0:31 ` [PATCH 01/02] USB: reorg some functions out of the main usb.c file Greg KH
2005-11-17 0:32 ` [PATCH 02/02] USB: add dynamic id functionality to USB core Greg KH
2005-11-17 15:55 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2005-11-17 16:25 ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-11-17 17:19 ` Alan Stern
2005-11-18 1:09 ` Greg KH
2005-11-17 19:58 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-11-18 1:39 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051117162533.GB26824@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox