From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751067AbVKRWWg (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:22:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751055AbVKRWWg (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:22:36 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:47334 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751046AbVKRWWf (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:22:35 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:22:31 -0800 From: Paul Jackson To: Al Boldi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-smp@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: MPP aware CPUSETS Message-Id: <20051118142231.6ddbb1ca.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <200511162337.23722.a1426z@gawab.com> References: <200511162337.23722.a1426z@gawab.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Would extending CPUSETS to make it MPP aware be a reasonable feature? I might expect not to extend cpusets, so much as layer abstractions on top of cpusets. Though since my focus is not on multi-node systems, I don't have any suggestions as to what sort of features and needs would drive such work. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401