public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at>
Cc: Tarkan Erimer <tarkane@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: what is our answer to ZFS?
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:42:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200511212342.47379.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1132603369.3306.1.camel@gimli.at.home>

On Monday 21 November 2005 14:02, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 12:52 -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> [...]
>
> > couple decades from now.  It's also proposing that data compression and
> > checksumming are the filesystem's job.  Hands up anybody who spots
> > conflicting trends here already?  Who thinks the 128 bit requirement came
> > from marketing rather than the engineers?
>
> Without compressing you probably need 256 bits.

I assume this is sarcasm.  Once again assuming you can someday manage to store 
1 bit per electron, it would have a corresponding 2^256 protons*, which would 
weigh (in grams):

> print 2**256/(6.02*(10**23))
1.92345663185e+53

Google for the weight of the earth:
http://www.ecology.com/earth-at-a-glance/earth-at-a-glance-feature/
Earth's Weight (Mass): 5.972 sextillion (1,000 trillion) metric tons.
Yeah, alright, mass...  So that's 5.972*10^18 metric tons, and a metric ton is 
a million grams, so 5.972*10^24 grams...

Google for the mass of the sun says that's 2*10^33 grams.  Still nowhere 
close.

Basically, as far as I can tell, any device capable of storing 2^256 bits 
would collapse into a black hole under its own weight.

By the way, 2^128/avogadro gives 5.65253101198e+14, or 565 million metric 
tons.  For comparison, the empire state building: 
http://www.newyorktransportation.com/info/empirefact2.html
Is 365,000 tons.  (Probably not metric, but you get the idea.)  Assuming I 
haven't screwed up the math, an object capable of storing anywhere near 2^128 
bits (constructed as a single giant molecule) would probably be in the size 
ballpark of new york, london, or tokyo.

2^64 we may actually live to see the end of someday, but it's not guaranteed.  
2^128 becoming relevant in our lifetimes is a touch unlikely.

Rob

* Yeah, I'm glossing over neutrons.  I'm also glossing over the possibility of 
storing more than one bit per electron and other quauntum strangeness.  I 
have no idea how you'd _build_ one of these suckers.  Nobody does yet.  
They're working on it...

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-22  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-21  9:28 what is our answer to ZFS? Alfred Brons
2005-11-21  9:44 ` Paulo Jorge Matos
2005-11-21  9:59   ` Alfred Brons
2005-11-21 10:08     ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-11-21 10:16     ` Andreas Happe
2005-11-21 11:30       ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-11-21 10:19     ` Jörn Engel
2005-11-21 11:46       ` Matthias Andree
2005-11-21 12:07         ` Kasper Sandberg
2005-11-21 13:18           ` Matthias Andree
2005-11-21 14:18             ` Kasper Sandberg
2005-11-21 14:41               ` Matthias Andree
2005-11-21 15:08                 ` Kasper Sandberg
2005-11-22  8:52                   ` Matthias Andree
2005-11-21 22:41               ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-21 20:48             ` jdow
2005-11-22 11:17               ` Jörn Engel
2005-11-21 11:59       ` Diego Calleja
2005-11-22  7:51       ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-22 10:28         ` Jörn Engel
2005-11-22 14:50         ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-11-22 15:25           ` Jan Harkes
2005-11-22 16:17             ` Chris Adams
2005-11-22 16:55               ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-11-22 17:18                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-11-22 19:25                   ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-11-22 19:52                     ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-11-22 20:00                       ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-11-22 23:02                         ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-11-22 21:14                       ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-22 21:06                 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-22 20:19               ` Alan Cox
2005-11-22 19:56                 ` Chris Adams
2005-11-22 21:19                   ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-23 19:20                   ` Generation numbers in stat was Re: what is slashdot's " Andi Kleen
2005-11-24  5:15                     ` Chris Adams
2005-11-24  8:47                       ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-22 16:28             ` what is our " Theodore Ts'o
2005-11-22 17:37               ` Jan Harkes
2005-11-22 16:36                 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-11-28 12:53       ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2005-11-29  5:04         ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-11-29  5:57           ` Willy Tarreau
2005-11-29 14:42             ` John Stoffel
2005-11-29 13:58           ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-29 16:03           ` Chris Adams
2005-11-21 11:45     ` Diego Calleja
2005-11-21 14:19       ` Tarkan Erimer
2005-11-21 18:52         ` Rob Landley
2005-11-21 19:28           ` Diego Calleja
2005-11-21 20:02           ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-11-22  5:42             ` Rob Landley [this message]
2005-11-22  9:25               ` Matthias Andree
2005-11-21 23:05           ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-22  0:15           ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-11-21 22:59             ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-11-22  7:45               ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-22  9:19                 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-11-22 16:00               ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-22 16:09                 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2005-11-22 20:16                   ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-22 16:14                 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-11-22 16:38                   ` Steve Flynn
2005-11-22  7:15             ` Rob Landley
2005-11-22  8:16               ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-11-22  0:45           ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-22  6:34             ` Rob Landley
2005-11-22 19:05               ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-22  9:20           ` Matthias Andree
2005-11-22 10:00             ` Tarkan Erimer
2005-11-22 15:46               ` Jan Dittmer
2005-11-22 16:27               ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-21 18:17       ` Rob Landley
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-24  1:52 art

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200511212342.47379.rob@landley.net \
    --to=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=bernd@firmix.at \
    --cc=diegocg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tarkane@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox