From: Sander <sander@humilis.net>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
sander@humilis.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
reiserfs-dev@namesys.com
Subject: Re: Please help me understand ->writepage. Was Re: segfault mdadm --write-behind, 2.6.14-mm2 (was: Re: RAID1 ramdisk patch)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:34:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051122103428.GA12072@favonius> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17282.35980.613583.592130@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Neil Brown wrote (ao):
> On Monday November 21, akpm@osdl.org wrote:
> > bitmap->filemap_attr can be allocated with kzalloc() now.
> Yes, thanks.
>
> So Sander, could you try this patch for main against reiser4? It
> seems to work on ext3 and tmpfs and has some chance of not mucking up
> on reiser4.
It doesn't crash or segfault anymore. It works with the bitmap file on
tmpfs, but not yet on reiser4.
This is kernel 2.6.15-rc1-mm2 with your (Neil Brown's) patch.
loop0 is connected to a file on tmpfs
loop1 to a file on reiser4
/storage/raid1.bitmap is also on reiser4
# mdadm -C /dev/md1 --bitmap=/storage/raid1.bitmap -l1 -n2 /dev/loop0 --write-behind /dev/loop1
mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: No such file or directory
# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] [multipath] [raid6] [raid10]
md0 : active raid1 sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sdb1[1] sda1[0]
1003904 blocks [4/4] [UUUU]
unused devices: <none>
# mdadm -C /dev/md1 --bitmap=/storage/raid1.bitmap -l1 -n2 /dev/loop0 --write-behind /dev/loop1
mdadm: /dev/loop0 appears to be part of a raid array:
level=raid1 devices=2 ctime=Tue Nov 22 11:09:15 2005
mdadm: /dev/loop1 appears to be part of a raid array:
level=raid1 devices=2 ctime=Tue Nov 22 11:09:15 2005
Continue creating array? yes
mdadm: bitmap file /storage/raid1.bitmap already exists, use --force to overwrite
# mdadm -C /dev/md1 -f --bitmap=/storage/raid1.bitmap -l1 -n2 /dev/loop0 --write-behind /dev/loop1
mdadm: /dev/loop0 appears to be part of a raid array:
level=raid1 devices=2 ctime=Tue Nov 22 11:09:15 2005
mdadm: /dev/loop1 appears to be part of a raid array:
level=raid1 devices=2 ctime=Tue Nov 22 11:09:15 2005
Continue creating array? yes
mdadm: RUN_ARRAY failed: Success
# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] [multipath] [raid6] [raid10]
md0 : active raid1 sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sdb1[1] sda1[0]
1003904 blocks [4/4] [UUUU]
unused devices: <none>
dmesg:
[42949583.660000] loop: loaded (max 8 devices)
[42949655.110000] md: bind<loop0>
[42949655.110000] md: bind<loop1>
[42949655.110000] md: md1: raid array is not clean -- starting background reconstruction
[42949655.110000] md1: bitmap file is out of date (0 < 1) -- forcing full recovery
[42949655.110000] md1: bitmap file is out of date, doing full recovery
[42949655.680000] md1: bitmap initialized from disk: read 0/4 pages, set 0 bits, status: 1
[42949655.680000] md1: failed to create bitmap (1)
[42949655.680000] md: pers->run() failed ...
[42949655.680000] md: md1 stopped.
[42949655.680000] md: unbind<loop1>
[42949655.680000] md: export_rdev(loop1)
[42949655.680000] md: unbind<loop0>
[42949655.680000] md: export_rdev(loop0)
[42949671.480000] md: bind<loop0>
[42949671.480000] md: bind<loop1>
[42949671.480000] md: md1: raid array is not clean -- starting background reconstruction
[42949671.480000] md1: bitmap file is out of date (0 < 1) -- forcing full recovery
[42949671.480000] md1: bitmap file is out of date, doing full recovery
[42949671.770000] md1: bitmap initialized from disk: read 0/4 pages, set 0 bits, status: 1
[42949671.770000] md1: failed to create bitmap (1)
[42949671.770000] md: pers->run() failed ...
[42949671.770000] md: md1 stopped.
[42949671.770000] md: unbind<loop1>
[42949671.770000] md: export_rdev(loop1)
[42949671.770000] md: unbind<loop0>
[42949671.770000] md: export_rdev(loop0)
It does work with the bitmap file on tmpfs:
# mdadm -C /dev/md1 -f --bitmap=/tmp/raid1.bitmap -l1 -n2 /dev/loop0 --write-behind /dev/loop1
mdadm: /dev/loop0 appears to be part of a raid array:
level=raid1 devices=2 ctime=Tue Nov 22 11:20:48 2005
mdadm: /dev/loop1 appears to be part of a raid array:
level=raid1 devices=2 ctime=Tue Nov 22 11:20:48 2005
Continue creating array? yes
mdadm: array /dev/md1 started.
silo1:~# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] [multipath] [raid6] [raid10]
md1 : active raid1 loop1[1] loop0[0]
509056 blocks [2/2] [UU]
[>....................] resync = 1.2% (6528/509056) finish=2.5min speed=3264K/sec
bitmap: 63/63 pages [252KB], 4KB chunk, file: /tmp/raid1.bitmap
md0 : active raid1 sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sdb1[1] sda1[0]
1003904 blocks [4/4] [UUUU]
unused devices: <none>
Is there anything you need me to test further?
Thanks for the patch!
Sander
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-22 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-05 0:46 RAID1 ramdisk patch Wilco Baan Hofman
2005-09-05 1:27 ` Neil Brown
2005-09-05 7:40 ` Wilco Baan Hofman
2005-11-16 13:36 ` segfault mdadm --write-behind, 2.6.14-mm2 (was: Re: RAID1 ramdisk patch) Sander
2005-11-16 22:20 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-16 23:08 ` Neil Brown
2005-11-17 7:50 ` Sander
2005-11-17 10:12 ` Sander
2005-11-17 10:15 ` Sander
2005-11-21 23:07 ` Please help me understand ->writepage. Was " Neil Brown
2005-11-21 23:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-11-21 23:51 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-22 3:12 ` Neil Brown
2005-11-22 3:47 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-22 10:34 ` Sander [this message]
2005-11-24 5:41 ` Please help me understand reiser4_writepage. " Neil Brown
2005-11-22 12:00 ` Please help me understand ->writepage. " Anton Altaparmakov
2005-11-24 5:29 ` Neil Brown
2005-11-18 14:18 ` segfault mdadm --write-behind, 2.6.14-mm2 Vladimir V. Saveliev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051122103428.GA12072@favonius \
--to=sander@humilis.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=reiserfs-dev@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox