From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Christmas list for the kernel
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:09:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051123090905.GA2867@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e4733910511221556n1fe390e5qcd778f39aa75695d@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 06:56:30PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> On 11/22/05, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Maw, 2005-11-22 at 16:41 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > > An example of this is that the serial driver is hard coded to report
> > > four legacy serial ports when my system physically only has two. I
> > > have to change a #define and recompile the kernel to change this.
> >
> > It does an autodetect sequence to find the ports. If it reports ttyS0-S3
> > your system probably has them, they may just not be wired to external
> > ports and that is kinda tricky to autodetect
>
> The ports really aren't there. If we had a driver for the LPC chip it
> would see that the chip only implemented two ports. On modern
> hardware a driver for LPC/super IO chips might be enough to do all of
> the needed legacy detection.
If the serial driver detects a port at a particular address, the
hardware or something which behaves very much like a serial port
is there.
However, as far as I recall, you've never reported this as a problem.
Care to put something in bugzilla or start a new thread? Starting
with the entire kernel messages with the DEBUG_AUTOCONF stuff enabled
in the 8250 driver would probably be good.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-23 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-22 18:31 Christmas list for the kernel Jon Smirl
2005-11-22 18:39 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-22 19:10 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 0:43 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-23 1:09 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 1:37 ` Josh Boyer
2005-11-23 2:00 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-23 5:18 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 5:45 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-23 16:12 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-23 19:27 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-22 19:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-22 19:57 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 22:16 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-23 22:12 ` Pavel Machek
2005-11-22 20:49 ` Greg KH
2005-11-22 21:13 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-22 21:28 ` Kasper Sandberg
2005-11-22 21:41 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-22 21:56 ` David Lang
2005-11-22 22:00 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-11-22 23:36 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-22 23:56 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 9:09 ` Russell King [this message]
2005-11-23 16:07 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-23 8:47 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-11-23 14:44 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-11-23 17:21 ` Gene Heskett
2005-11-23 17:30 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 19:28 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-22 23:35 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-22 23:58 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 0:37 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-11-23 11:19 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-23 12:17 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-11-23 14:43 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 15:03 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 15:12 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 15:56 ` Marc Koschewski
2005-11-23 16:05 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 16:37 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 16:49 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-11-23 16:59 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 17:05 ` Marc Koschewski
2005-11-23 17:13 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 17:16 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-11-23 17:24 ` Marc Koschewski
2005-11-23 17:15 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-11-23 19:32 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-23 15:19 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 15:25 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 15:31 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 15:36 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 16:02 ` Marc Koschewski
2005-11-23 16:16 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 16:23 ` Marc Koschewski
2005-11-23 16:23 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-11-23 16:27 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 16:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-23 16:34 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-11-23 16:33 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-11-23 15:20 ` Pierre Ossman
2005-11-23 15:29 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 15:39 ` Pierre Ossman
2005-11-23 15:51 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 15:49 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 15:56 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 16:32 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-11-23 16:50 ` Jon Smirl
2005-11-23 15:49 ` John Stoffel
2005-11-23 15:27 ` Martin Mares
2005-11-22 21:28 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-22 23:33 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-23 7:10 ` Early boot issues (WAS: Christmas list for the kernel) Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-11-23 19:47 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-22 22:11 ` Christmas list for the kernel Bill Davidsen
2005-11-24 4:17 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-23 22:23 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051123090905.GA2867@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@metanurb.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox