From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932081AbVKXPA6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:00:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932074AbVKXPA6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:00:58 -0500 Received: from relay.axxeo.de ([213.239.199.237]:19355 "EHLO relay.axxeo.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751312AbVKXPA5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:00:57 -0500 From: Ingo Oeser Organization: Axxeo GmbH To: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] ioat: DMA subsystem Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:00:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Cc: Andrew Grover , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john.ronciak@intel.com, christopher.leech@intel.com References: <4384F0C4.1090209@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <4384F0C4.1090209@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511241600.50046.netdev@axxeo.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Jeff Garzik wrote: > explanation of this function would be nice. remember to answer "how?" > and "why?", not "what?". Wasn't it the other way around? Citing linux/Documentation/CodingStyle, section 7 "Comments": "Generally, you want your comments to tell WHAT your code does, not HOW." HOW and WHY should be obvious by the source code, unless the sources are a mess. Regards Ingo Oeser