From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Franck <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [NET] Remove ARM dependency for dm9000 driver
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:55:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051130165546.GD1053@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cda58cb80511300845j18c81ce6p@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 05:45:33PM +0100, Franck wrote:
> 2005/11/30, Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 05:21:35PM +0100, Franck wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What about this patch which removes ARM dependency for dm9000 ethernet
> > > controller driver ?
> > >
> > Maybe that should be (ARM || MIPS) && NET_ETHERNET ?
> >
>
> Well, if this dependency means "it has only be tested on ARM and
> MIPS", then you're probably right. But if it means "this controller
> must be run with an ARM or MIPS cpu" then I don't see why setting such
> restriction. What do you think ?
If other CPUs use this then fine, but I find that having config options
needlessly available to all architectures is annoying - especially when
they are never used.
Eg, would you ever expect to see a DM9000 ethernet device on an x86
machine? Probably not - there's far better PCI solutions now.
So until someone says "I want to use this on such and such arch" I
think it's better to keep it dependent on those we know are likely
to support it.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-30 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-30 16:21 [NET] Remove ARM dependency for dm9000 driver Franck
2005-11-30 16:23 ` Russell King
2005-11-30 16:45 ` Franck
2005-11-30 16:55 ` Russell King [this message]
2005-11-30 17:07 ` Franck
2005-11-30 18:14 ` David Woodhouse
2005-11-30 19:02 ` Russell King
2005-12-01 8:36 ` David Woodhouse
2005-12-01 9:41 ` Russell King
2005-12-01 9:51 ` David S. Miller
2005-12-01 10:52 ` Russell King
2005-12-01 11:11 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-12-01 11:37 ` Russell King
2005-12-01 15:20 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-12-01 11:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-30 21:48 ` David S. Miller
2005-12-01 7:56 ` Franck
2005-12-01 23:17 ` Matan Ziv-Av
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051130165546.GD1053@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vagabon.xyz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox