public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: ray-gmail@madrabbit.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org,
	mrmacman_g4@mac.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, george@mvista.com,
	johnstul@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 00/43] ktimer reworked
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:24:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051201122455.4546d1da.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051201165144.GC31551@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> rmk, also a native English speaker, agrees with Ray, Thomas and Ingo.
>  As does dictionary.reference.com's definitions of timeout and timer:
> 
>   timeout
> 
>    A period of time after which an error condition is raised if some event
>    has not occured. A common example is sending a message. If the receiver
>    does not acknowledge the message within some preset timeout period, a
>    transmission error is assumed to have occured.
> 
>   timer
> 
>    a timepiece that measures a time interval and signals its end
> 
>  Hence, timers have the implication that they are _expected_ to expire.
>  Timeouts have the implication that their expiry is an exceptional
>  condition.

Well timer_lists get around the problem quite neatly by handling both
situations.  In a way which has been learned by thousands of developers
over many years.

The whole concept of separating "timers" from "timeouts" seems a step
backward to me.  A large one.   Why was it done, and can it be undone?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-12-01 20:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-30 23:56 [patch 00/43] ktimer reworked Thomas Gleixner
2005-12-01  0:41 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-01  2:19   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-01  3:32 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-01  3:57   ` Kyle Moffett
2005-12-01 15:40     ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-01 16:22       ` Ray Lee
2005-12-01 16:51         ` Russell King
2005-12-01 17:44           ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-01 19:08             ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-01 21:11               ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-01 22:03                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-02  0:29                   ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-02  0:41                     ` Kyle Moffett
2005-12-02  0:58                       ` john stultz
2005-12-02  1:01                       ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-02  1:09                         ` Kyle Moffett
2005-12-02  1:24                           ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-02  1:47                             ` David Lang
2005-12-02 14:43                               ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-02 15:41                                 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-12-07  9:35                                 ` James Bruce
2005-12-07 12:34                                   ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-07 14:15                                     ` Kyle Moffett
2005-12-07 15:03                                       ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-07 14:17                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-08 15:43                                     ` James Bruce
2005-12-02  2:51                     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-04  1:28               ` Andrew James Wade
2005-12-05 19:40                 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-06  2:46                   ` Andrew James Wade
2005-12-01 20:24           ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-12-01 21:19             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-01 21:51               ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-01 22:13                 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-12-01 22:15                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-02  0:02                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-12-02  0:36                       ` Kyle Moffett
2005-12-02  1:06                         ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-02 14:42                         ` John Stoffel
2005-12-02  2:21                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-02  0:46                   ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-01 16:52         ` Roman Zippel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051201122455.4546d1da.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
    --cc=ray-gmail@madrabbit.org \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox