From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org,
shai@scalex86.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local PDA -- allocate node local memory for pda
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 23:41:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051202224104.GE9766@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051202200234.GB3727@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:02:34PM -0800, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:47:09PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:23:09AM -0800, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> > > Patch uses a static PDA array early at boot and reallocates processor PDA
> > > with node local memory when kmalloc is ready, just before pda_init.
> > > The boot_cpu_pda is needed sice the cpu_pda is used even before pda_init for
> > > that cpu is called (to set the static per-cpu areas offset table etc)
> >
> > Where is it needed? Perhaps it should be just allocated in the
> > CPU triggering the other CPU start instead. Then you could avoid that
> > or rather only define a __initdata boot_pda for the BP.
> >
>
> setup_per_cpu_areas() is invoked quite early in the boot process and it
> writes into the cpu_pda.data_offset field for all the cpus. I'd even tried
> storing the offset table for cpus in a temporary table (which can be marked
> __initdata and discarded later), but there were references
> to the static per cpu areas through per_cpu macros (which need to use the
> cpu_pda) even before the BP boots up and starts the secondary cpus,
> resulting in early exceptions.
Move it into smpboot.c then on the parent CPU.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-02 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-02 8:10 [patch 1/3] x86_64: Node local PDA -- early cpu_to_node Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-02 8:16 ` [patch 2/3] x86_64: Node local PDA -- Use macros to access cpu_pda Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-02 8:23 ` [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local PDA -- allocate node local memory for pda Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-02 8:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-02 18:24 ` [discuss] " Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-02 9:05 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-02 10:36 ` [RFC] NUMA aware kthread_create() ? Eric Dumazet
2005-12-02 12:32 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-12-02 11:47 ` [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local PDA -- allocate node local memory for pda Andi Kleen
2005-12-02 20:02 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-02 22:41 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-12-02 11:43 ` [patch 1/3] x86_64: Node local PDA -- early cpu_to_node Andi Kleen
2005-12-02 22:51 ` [discuss] " Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-02 23:02 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-02 23:43 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-02 23:48 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051202224104.GE9766@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shai@scalex86.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox