From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750842AbVLCVG0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:06:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751231AbVLCVG0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:06:26 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:26838 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750842AbVLCVGZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:06:25 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 13:03:15 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86 PCI domain support Message-ID: <20051203210315.GA4822@suse.de> References: <20051203013904.GA2560@havoc.gtf.org> <20051203031533.GB14247@wotan.suse.de> <4391FC0A.9040202@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4391FC0A.9040202@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 03:11:54PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:39:04PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >>ACPI PCI support stopped short of supporting multiple PCI domains, > >>which is something I need in order to support a current machine > >>configuration, and something many will soon need, to support upcoming > >>systems. > >> > >>This is a minimal, untested implementation. But it should work, > >>provided your PCI op hooks (direct, BIOS, mmconfig) support PCI domains > >>(mmconfig). > > > > > >It looks like a good start. Thanks for doing this. > > > >It actually needs some more fixes - e.g. falling back to > >type1 if the bus is not covered in MCFG (needed for the > >K8 internal busses) and a workaround for buggy Asus BIOS with wrong MCFG. > >I have that in the works. > > > >But your changes are needed too - or at least they are correct > >according to the spec. I don't know of a system that actually > >has different mmconfig apertures for different busses yet. > >The only case that's interesting right now is that some busses > >don't support it at all, but these don't need a seg number, > >just a non listing in MCFG. > > > >Greg are you queueing this up? > > The first two patches could go in immediately, the last should probably > wait a bit... Ok, I'll queue up all of them for testing in the next few -mm releases before sending them on. Care to add some "Signed-off-by:" lines to the patches? thanks, greg k-h