From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, cpufreq <cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CPU frequency display in /proc/cpuinfo
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 19:32:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051204183239.GE14247@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051204164335.GB32492@isilmar.linta.de>
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 05:43:35PM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 10:43:20AM -0800, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> > The patch below changes this to:
> > Show the last known frequency of the particular CPU, when cpufreq is present. If
> > cpu doesnot support changing of frequency through cpufreq, then boot frequency
> > will be shown. The patch affects i386, x86_64 and ia64 architectures.
>
> Looks good to me -- however, might this affect userspace cpufreq tools? I'd
They normally use /sys anyways.
> vote for quite some time in -mm for this patch (i.e. only merge for 2.6.17)
Actually it just changes behaviour back to older kernels (~2.6.10 or earlier)
which always behaved like this. So it should be safe.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-04 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-02 18:13 [PATCH] CPU frequency display in /proc/cpuinfo Venkatesh Pallipadi
2005-12-02 18:19 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-02 18:43 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2005-12-04 16:43 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-12-04 18:32 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-12-04 19:49 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-04 20:13 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-04 21:01 ` Horst von Brand
2005-12-05 1:16 ` Dave Jones
2005-12-05 13:02 ` Erik Mouw
2005-12-05 17:25 ` Dave Jones
2005-12-05 17:27 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-06 11:13 ` Erik Mouw
2005-12-06 16:56 ` Dave Jones
2005-12-06 17:35 ` Erik Mouw
2005-12-05 15:32 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-05 18:36 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-05 15:59 ` Mark Lord
2005-12-05 17:26 ` Dave Jones
2005-12-05 16:29 ` Avi Kivity
2005-12-05 16:46 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-12-05 17:27 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051204183239.GE14247@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox