public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:19:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051205081935.GI22168@hexapodia.org> (raw)

On recent kernels such as 2.6.14-rc2-mm1, a swsusp of my laptop (1.25
GB, P4M 1.4 GHz) was a pretty fast process; freeing memory took about 3
seconds or less, and writing out the swap image took less than 5
seconds, so within 15 seconds of running my suspend script power was
off.

The downside was that after suspend, *everything* needed to be paged
back in, so all my apps were *very* slow for the first few interactions.
It would take about 15 or 20 seconds for Firefox to repaint the first
time I switched to its virtual desktop, and it was perceptibly slower
than normal for the next 5 or 10 minutes of use.

Now that I'm running 2.6.15-rc3-mm1, the page-in problem seems to be
largely gone; I don't notice a significant lagginess after resuming from
swsusp.

But the suspend process is *slow*.  It takes a good 20 or 30 seconds to
write out the image, which makes the overall suspend process take close
to a minute; it's writing about 400 MB, and my disk seems to only be
good for about 18 MB/sec according to hdparm -t.

And, the resume is about the same amount slower, too.

Certainly there's a tradeoff to be made, and I'm glad to lose the slow
re-paging after resume, but I'm hoping that some kind of improvement can
be made in the suspend/resume time.

Could we perhaps throw away *half* the cached memory rather than all of
it?  Or keep a lazy list of pages that need re-reading and page them in
asynchronously after restarting userland?

-andy

             reply	other threads:[~2005-12-05  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-05  8:19 Andy Isaacson [this message]
2005-12-05 12:17 ` swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 13:58   ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-05 17:29     ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 21:11       ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-05 23:34         ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06  1:26           ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06  1:52             ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 22:44       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06  0:01         ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 22:28     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06  1:07       ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06  1:37         ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06  1:47           ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06  1:56             ` IDE performance on notebooks [was Re: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1] Pavel Machek
2005-12-06  6:23               ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06 11:56                 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06  1:57             ` swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06  3:50             ` Mark Lord
2005-12-06 15:03               ` Mark Lord
2005-12-06  2:02           ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 12:09             ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06  1:36       ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06  2:06         ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06  2:21           ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 14:22             ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 22:05               ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-07 22:23                 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06  2:21           ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 12:18           ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 18:15             ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-07  1:05               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07  1:10                 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 11:17                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 11:30                     ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-08 22:42                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-08 22:50                         ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 21:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-05 23:55     ` swsusp: how much memory to free? [was Re: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1] Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 11:53       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 11:59         ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 12:16           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 12:18             ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 23:05 ` swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06  0:12   ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06  0:51     ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-10 22:21   ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-10 23:07     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-10 23:33       ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-11 12:16         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-11 23:28           ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-12 17:45             ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051205081935.GI22168@hexapodia.org \
    --to=adi@hexapodia.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox