From: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:19:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051205081935.GI22168@hexapodia.org> (raw)
On recent kernels such as 2.6.14-rc2-mm1, a swsusp of my laptop (1.25
GB, P4M 1.4 GHz) was a pretty fast process; freeing memory took about 3
seconds or less, and writing out the swap image took less than 5
seconds, so within 15 seconds of running my suspend script power was
off.
The downside was that after suspend, *everything* needed to be paged
back in, so all my apps were *very* slow for the first few interactions.
It would take about 15 or 20 seconds for Firefox to repaint the first
time I switched to its virtual desktop, and it was perceptibly slower
than normal for the next 5 or 10 minutes of use.
Now that I'm running 2.6.15-rc3-mm1, the page-in problem seems to be
largely gone; I don't notice a significant lagginess after resuming from
swsusp.
But the suspend process is *slow*. It takes a good 20 or 30 seconds to
write out the image, which makes the overall suspend process take close
to a minute; it's writing about 400 MB, and my disk seems to only be
good for about 18 MB/sec according to hdparm -t.
And, the resume is about the same amount slower, too.
Certainly there's a tradeoff to be made, and I'm glad to lose the slow
re-paging after resume, but I'm hoping that some kind of improvement can
be made in the suspend/resume time.
Could we perhaps throw away *half* the cached memory rather than all of
it? Or keep a lazy list of pages that need re-reading and page them in
asynchronously after restarting userland?
-andy
next reply other threads:[~2005-12-05 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-05 8:19 Andy Isaacson [this message]
2005-12-05 12:17 ` swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 13:58 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-05 17:29 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 21:11 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-05 23:34 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 1:26 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 1:52 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 22:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06 0:01 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06 1:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 1:37 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 1:47 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06 1:56 ` IDE performance on notebooks [was Re: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1] Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 6:23 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06 11:56 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 1:57 ` swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 3:50 ` Mark Lord
2005-12-06 15:03 ` Mark Lord
2005-12-06 2:02 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 12:09 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 1:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 2:06 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06 2:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 14:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 22:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-07 22:23 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 2:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-12-06 12:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 18:15 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-07 1:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 1:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 11:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 11:30 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-08 22:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-08 22:50 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 21:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-05 23:55 ` swsusp: how much memory to free? [was Re: swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1] Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 11:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 11:59 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-07 12:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-07 12:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-05 23:05 ` swsusp performance problems in 2.6.15-rc3-mm1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-06 0:12 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-06 0:51 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-10 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-10 23:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-10 23:33 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-11 12:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-12-11 23:28 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-12 17:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051205081935.GI22168@hexapodia.org \
--to=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox