From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932636AbVLFW1s (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:27:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932643AbVLFW1s (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:27:48 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:61934 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932636AbVLFW1r convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:27:47 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Paul Mackerras , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] spufs: fix local store page refcounting Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:27:08 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: Pekka Enberg , linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjan@infradead.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk References: <20051206035220.097737000@localhost> <1133905298.8027.13.camel@localhost> <17302.3696.364669.18755@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <17302.3696.364669.18755@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512062327.08448.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:bf0b512fe2ff06b96d9695102898be39 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag 06 Dezember 2005 23:19 schrieb Paul Mackerras: > Having it in fs/ also means that it is more likely that people > familiar with VFS internals will look through your code and comment on > it.  I know that can be painful in the short term, but in the long > term it will lead to better code. Yes, that is an excellent point. How should we proceed to get the code there? Do you want to move the files around in your git tree or do you prefer me to send a full set of patches again and kill the existing copy? Obviously, I'd prefer the former, since it would mean less work for me with the same result. Arnd <><