From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932576AbVLGFaR (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:30:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932607AbVLGFaR (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:30:17 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:671 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932576AbVLGFaP (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:30:15 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:23:27 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86 PCI domain support Message-ID: <20051207052327.GA21229@kroah.com> References: <20051203013904.GA2560@havoc.gtf.org> <20051203031533.GB14247@wotan.suse.de> <4391FC0A.9040202@pobox.com> <20051207003922.GA18528@kroah.com> <43964586.3080300@pobox.com> <20051207023305.GA19746@kroah.com> <43966117.9040700@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43966117.9040700@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:12:07PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > >On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:14:30PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >>Greg KH wrote: > >> > >>>On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 03:11:54PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>The first two patches could go in immediately, the last should probably > >>>>wait a bit... > >>> > >>> > >>>What is the rush? These seem pretty late for the -rc series :) > >>> > >>>I'll send them in after 2.6.15 is out, is that ok? > >> > >>You were supposed to read my mind :) "immediately" meant "ok for > >>upstream when -rc cycle closes" :) The third patch I don't consider > >>ready for upstream, -rc or no. > > > > > >Ok, thanks. But I did just include the third patch in my tree, so it > >will get tested in -mm. If you don't want this to happen, just let me > >know and I'll drop it. > > There's no ultimate harm in it, because nothing turns on > CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS in x86[-64] yet... I'm guessing that will be a follow-on patch? :) greg k-h