From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750706AbVLGJCT (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 04:02:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750732AbVLGJCT (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 04:02:19 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:53403 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750706AbVLGJCS (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 04:02:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 10:02:37 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Lee Revell Cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: Softirq preemption Message-ID: <20051207090237.GA22918@elte.hu> References: <1133464131.7898.30.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1133464131.7898.30.camel@mindpipe> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Lee Revell wrote: > Is there any chance that the softirq preemption feature from the -rt > kernel can be pushed upstream? yeah, will do it, once the current hrtimer push has been completed. The softirq/hardirq preemption feature is dependent on the genirq patch too. Ingo