public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduardo Pereira Habkost <ehabkost@mandriva.com>
To: Luiz Fernando Capitulino <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t.
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 15:13:32 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051207171332.GI20451@duckman.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051207145113.4cbdc264.lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2049 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:51:13PM -0200, Luiz Fernando Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 08:41:18 -0800
> Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> | On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:56:10AM -0200, Luiz Fernando Capitulino wrote:
> | >  Greg,
> | > 
> | >  Don't get scared. :-)
> | 
> | I'm not scared, just not liking this patch series at all.
> | 
> | In the end, it's just moving from one locking scheme to another.  No big
> | deal.
> 
>  I understand.
> 
> | The problem is, none of this should be needed at all.  We need to move
> | the usb-serial drivers over to use the serial core code.  If that
> | happens, then none of this locking is needed.
> | 
> | That's the right thing to do, so I'm not going to take this patch series
> | right now because of that.  If you all want to work on moving to use the
> | serial core, I would love to see that happen.
> 
>  If it's the right thing to do, I'll love to work on that. :)
> 
>  There is only one problem though, I've never touched in the serial core.
> It means I'll need some time to do it, and maybe the first tries can be
> wrong.
> 
>  Any tips you have in mind are very welcome.

I have a small question: in my view, this patch series is a small
step towards implementing the usb-serial drivers The Right Way, as it
removes a a bit of duplicated code. If we start to do The Big Change to
serial_core , probably we would make further refactorings on these parts,
going towards The Right Way to implement the drivers.

My question would be: where would the small refactorings belong, while
the big change to serial_core is work in progress? I would like them
to go to some tree for testing, while the work is being done, instead
of pushing lots of changes later, but I don't know if there is someone
who we could send them.

> 
>  Eduardo, let's do it? :)

I would love it, but I will be on vacations in two weeks. So, probably
on January.

My wife is lucky that I won't have a notebook available during our
vacations.  8)

-- 
Eduardo

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-07 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-06 11:56 [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-06 19:40 ` Greg KH
2005-12-06 20:13   ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2005-12-06 22:48     ` [linux-usb-devel] " Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 12:24       ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 12:27         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 12:30           ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 12:34             ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 12:41               ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 12:54                 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 15:07       ` Alan Stern
2005-12-07 15:22         ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 15:37           ` Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 15:40             ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 15:50               ` Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 16:02                 ` Alan Cox
2005-12-07 16:00           ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2005-12-07 16:02             ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 16:23               ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2005-12-07 16:01           ` Alan Stern
2005-12-07 16:04             ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 15:32         ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-12-07 16:08           ` Alan Stern
2005-12-06 20:14   ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-06 21:02     ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-12-06 21:18       ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-06 22:36         ` [linux-usb-devel] " Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 12:25           ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 13:01             ` Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 13:17               ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 16:41 ` Greg KH
2005-12-07 16:51   ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 17:13     ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost [this message]
2005-12-07 17:56       ` Greg KH
2005-12-07 19:10         ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2005-12-07 16:55   ` Otavio Salvador
2005-12-07 16:59     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051207171332.GI20451@duckman.conectiva \
    --to=ehabkost@mandriva.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox