From: Eduardo Pereira Habkost <ehabkost@mandriva.com>
To: Luiz Fernando Capitulino <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t.
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 15:13:32 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051207171332.GI20451@duckman.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051207145113.4cbdc264.lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2049 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:51:13PM -0200, Luiz Fernando Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 08:41:18 -0800
> Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
>
> | On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:56:10AM -0200, Luiz Fernando Capitulino wrote:
> | > Greg,
> | >
> | > Don't get scared. :-)
> |
> | I'm not scared, just not liking this patch series at all.
> |
> | In the end, it's just moving from one locking scheme to another. No big
> | deal.
>
> I understand.
>
> | The problem is, none of this should be needed at all. We need to move
> | the usb-serial drivers over to use the serial core code. If that
> | happens, then none of this locking is needed.
> |
> | That's the right thing to do, so I'm not going to take this patch series
> | right now because of that. If you all want to work on moving to use the
> | serial core, I would love to see that happen.
>
> If it's the right thing to do, I'll love to work on that. :)
>
> There is only one problem though, I've never touched in the serial core.
> It means I'll need some time to do it, and maybe the first tries can be
> wrong.
>
> Any tips you have in mind are very welcome.
I have a small question: in my view, this patch series is a small
step towards implementing the usb-serial drivers The Right Way, as it
removes a a bit of duplicated code. If we start to do The Big Change to
serial_core , probably we would make further refactorings on these parts,
going towards The Right Way to implement the drivers.
My question would be: where would the small refactorings belong, while
the big change to serial_core is work in progress? I would like them
to go to some tree for testing, while the work is being done, instead
of pushing lots of changes later, but I don't know if there is someone
who we could send them.
>
> Eduardo, let's do it? :)
I would love it, but I will be on vacations in two weeks. So, probably
on January.
My wife is lucky that I won't have a notebook available during our
vacations. 8)
--
Eduardo
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-07 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-06 11:56 [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-06 19:40 ` Greg KH
2005-12-06 20:13 ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2005-12-06 22:48 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 12:24 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 12:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 12:30 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 12:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 12:41 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 12:54 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 15:07 ` Alan Stern
2005-12-07 15:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 15:37 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 15:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 15:50 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 16:02 ` Alan Cox
2005-12-07 16:00 ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2005-12-07 16:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 16:23 ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2005-12-07 16:01 ` Alan Stern
2005-12-07 16:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 15:32 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-12-07 16:08 ` Alan Stern
2005-12-06 20:14 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-06 21:02 ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-12-06 21:18 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-06 22:36 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 12:25 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 13:01 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 13:17 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 16:41 ` Greg KH
2005-12-07 16:51 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 17:13 ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost [this message]
2005-12-07 17:56 ` Greg KH
2005-12-07 19:10 ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2005-12-07 16:55 ` Otavio Salvador
2005-12-07 16:59 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051207171332.GI20451@duckman.conectiva \
--to=ehabkost@mandriva.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox