Re: [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype

[Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>]

On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 12:59:09PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 12/7/05, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net> wrote:
> > On Monday 05 December 2005 15:27, Russell King wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:23:37PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > > The name parameter of platform_device_register_simple should be of
> > > > type const char * instead of char *, as we simply pass it to
> > > > platform_device_alloc, where it has type const char *.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > >
> > > However, I've been wondering whether we want to keep this "simple"
> > > interface around long-term given that we now have a more flexible
> > > platform device allocation interface - I don't particularly like
> > > having superfluous interfaces for folk to get confused with.
> >
> > Now that you made platform_device_alloc install default release
> > handler there is no need to have the _simple interface. I will
> > convert input devices (main users of _simple) to the new interface
> > and then we can get rid of it.
> >
> 
> I have started moving drivers from the "_simple" interface and I found
> that I'm missing platform_device_del that would complement
> platform_device_add. Would you object to having such a function, like
> we do for other sysfs objects? With it one can write somthing like
> this:

Greg and myself discussed that, and we decided that it was adding
unnecessary complexity to the interface.  Maybe Greg's view has
changed?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core