From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932693AbVLHWuv (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:50:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932694AbVLHWuu (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:50:50 -0500 Received: from anf141.internetdsl.tpnet.pl ([83.17.87.141]:8391 "EHLO anf141.internetdsl.tpnet.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932693AbVLHWuu (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:50:50 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] suspend from userland Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 23:52:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 Cc: kernel list , Linux-pm mailing list References: <20051207011753.GA2526@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20051207011753.GA2526@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512082352.07659.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wednesday, 7 December 2005 02:17, Pavel Machek wrote: > I'd like to get some testing and comments on this. I know that > userland part is messy and will not work on x86-64 etc, and I should > obviously remove some extra printk's... but otherwise it should be okay. > > Testing would be nice, too, but be a bit careful. It should not be > more dangerous than /sys/power/resume, but... If you suspect something > unusual, be sure to force fsck. Could we please postpone it for some time? First, the patch doesn't apply to the current -mm and the userland part is incompatible with the code there to the extent of a serious breakage (let alone the x86-64 issue). Second, if I had some time to get my solution ready, we could compare the alternatives instead of just discussing one of them. Greetings, Rafael -- Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy - Benjamin Franklin