* [patch 0/2] Add platform_device_del()
@ 2005-12-10 6:36 Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-10 6:36 ` [patch 1/2] " Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-10 6:36 ` [patch 2/2] Rearrange exports in platform.c Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2005-12-10 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: LKML, Russell King, Jean Delvare
Hi,
OK, so here is the patch adding platform_device_del() that we were
discussing. The second patch just moves exports around so we do not
mix two styles in one source file.
Greg, if you are OK with it - are you going to push it or maybe I
should put it in my tree so I can publish pieces depending on this
as they are getting ready?
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [patch 1/2] Add platform_device_del()
2005-12-10 6:36 [patch 0/2] Add platform_device_del() Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2005-12-10 6:36 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-10 16:58 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-10 6:36 ` [patch 2/2] Rearrange exports in platform.c Dmitry Torokhov
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2005-12-10 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: LKML, Russell King, Jean Delvare
[-- Attachment #1: platform-device-del.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3207 bytes --]
Driver core: add platform_device_del function
Having platform_device_del90 allows more straightforward error
handling code in drivers registering platform devices.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
---
drivers/base/platform.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
include/linux/platform_device.h | 1
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Index: work/drivers/base/platform.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ work/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ struct platform_device *platform_device_
pa->pdev.dev.release = platform_device_release;
}
- return pa ? &pa->pdev : NULL;
+ return pa ? &pa->pdev : NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_alloc);
@@ -282,24 +282,13 @@ int platform_device_add(struct platform_
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_add);
/**
- * platform_device_register - add a platform-level device
- * @pdev: platform device we're adding
- *
- */
-int platform_device_register(struct platform_device * pdev)
-{
- device_initialize(&pdev->dev);
- return platform_device_add(pdev);
-}
-
-/**
- * platform_device_unregister - remove a platform-level device
+ * platform_device_del - remove a platform-level device
* @pdev: platform device we're removing
*
* Note that this function will also release all memory- and port-based
* resources owned by the device (@dev->resource).
*/
-void platform_device_unregister(struct platform_device * pdev)
+void platform_device_del(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
int i;
@@ -310,9 +299,35 @@ void platform_device_unregister(struct p
release_resource(r);
}
- device_unregister(&pdev->dev);
+ device_del(&pdev->dev);
}
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_del);
+
+/**
+ * platform_device_register - add a platform-level device
+ * @pdev: platform device we're adding
+ *
+ */
+int platform_device_register(struct platform_device * pdev)
+{
+ device_initialize(&pdev->dev);
+ return platform_device_add(pdev);
+}
+
+/**
+ * platform_device_unregister - unregister a platform-level device
+ * @pdev: platform device we're unregistering
+ *
+ * Unregistration is done in 2 steps. Fisrt we release all resources
+ * and remove it from the sybsystem, then we drop reference count by
+ * calling platform_device_put().
+ */
+void platform_device_unregister(struct platform_device * pdev)
+{
+ platform_device_del(pdev);
+ platform_device_put(pdev);
+}
/**
* platform_device_register_simple
Index: work/include/linux/platform_device.h
===================================================================
--- work.orig/include/linux/platform_device.h
+++ work/include/linux/platform_device.h
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ extern struct platform_device *platform_
extern int platform_device_add_resources(struct platform_device *pdev, struct resource *res, unsigned int num);
extern int platform_device_add_data(struct platform_device *pdev, void *data, size_t size);
extern int platform_device_add(struct platform_device *pdev);
+extern void platform_device_del(struct platform_device *pdev);
extern void platform_device_put(struct platform_device *pdev);
struct platform_driver {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [patch 2/2] Rearrange exports in platform.c
2005-12-10 6:36 [patch 0/2] Add platform_device_del() Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-10 6:36 ` [patch 1/2] " Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2005-12-10 6:36 ` Dmitry Torokhov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2005-12-10 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: LKML, Russell King, Jean Delvare
[-- Attachment #1: platform-rearange-exports.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3076 bytes --]
Driver core: rearrange exports in platform.c
The new way is to specify export right after symbol definition.
Rearrange exports to follow new style to avoid mixing two styles
in one file.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
---
drivers/base/platform.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Index: work/drivers/base/platform.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ work/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
struct device platform_bus = {
.bus_id = "platform",
};
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_bus);
/**
* platform_get_resource - get a resource for a device
@@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ platform_get_resource(struct platform_de
}
return NULL;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_resource);
/**
* platform_get_irq - get an IRQ for a device
@@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ int platform_get_irq(struct platform_dev
return r ? r->start : 0;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_irq);
/**
* platform_get_resource_byname - get a resource for a device by name
@@ -84,6 +87,7 @@ platform_get_resource_byname(struct plat
}
return NULL;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_resource_byname);
/**
* platform_get_irq - get an IRQ for a device
@@ -96,6 +100,7 @@ int platform_get_irq_byname(struct platf
return r ? r->start : 0;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_irq_byname);
/**
* platform_add_devices - add a numbers of platform devices
@@ -117,6 +122,7 @@ int platform_add_devices(struct platform
return ret;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_add_devices);
struct platform_object {
struct platform_device pdev;
@@ -314,6 +320,7 @@ int platform_device_register(struct plat
device_initialize(&pdev->dev);
return platform_device_add(pdev);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_register);
/**
* platform_device_unregister - unregister a platform-level device
@@ -328,6 +335,7 @@ void platform_device_unregister(struct p
platform_device_del(pdev);
platform_device_put(pdev);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_unregister);
/**
* platform_device_register_simple
@@ -370,6 +378,7 @@ error:
platform_device_put(pdev);
return ERR_PTR(retval);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_register_simple);
static int platform_drv_probe(struct device *_dev)
{
@@ -491,6 +500,7 @@ struct bus_type platform_bus_type = {
.suspend = platform_suspend,
.resume = platform_resume,
};
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_bus_type);
int __init platform_bus_init(void)
{
@@ -519,14 +529,3 @@ u64 dma_get_required_mask(struct device
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_required_mask);
#endif
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_bus);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_bus_type);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_add_devices);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_register);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_register_simple);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_device_unregister);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_irq);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_resource);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_irq_byname);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_resource_byname);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 1/2] Add platform_device_del()
2005-12-10 6:36 ` [patch 1/2] " Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2005-12-10 16:58 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-10 17:47 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2005-12-10 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Torokhov; +Cc: Greg KH, LKML, Russell King
Hi Dmirty,
> Driver core: add platform_device_del function
>
> Having platform_device_del90 allows more straightforward error
> handling code in drivers registering platform devices.
> (...)
> +/**
> + * platform_device_unregister - unregister a platform-level device
> + * @pdev: platform device we're unregistering
> + *
> + * Unregistration is done in 2 steps. Fisrt we release all resources
> + * and remove it from the sybsystem, then we drop reference count by
Typo: subsystem.
> + * calling platform_device_put().
> + */
Other than that, and let alone the fact that I prefer code cleanups as
separate patches, and the fact that I don't think moving
platform_device_register() around adds much value, this patch looks
good to me.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 1/2] Add platform_device_del()
2005-12-10 16:58 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2005-12-10 17:47 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2005-12-10 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jean Delvare; +Cc: Greg KH, LKML, Russell King
Hi Jean,
On Saturday 10 December 2005 11:58, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Dmirty,
>
> > Driver core: add platform_device_del function
> >
> > Having platform_device_del90 allows more straightforward error
> > handling code in drivers registering platform devices.
> > (...)
> > +/**
> > + * platform_device_unregister - unregister a platform-level device
> > + * @pdev: platform device we're unregistering
> > + *
> > + * Unregistration is done in 2 steps. Fisrt we release all resources
> > + * and remove it from the sybsystem, then we drop reference count by
>
> Typo: subsystem.
Will fix, thank you for noticing.
>
> > + * calling platform_device_put().
> > + */
>
> Other than that, and let alone the fact that I prefer code cleanups as
> separate patches, and the fact that I don't think moving
> platform_device_register() around adds much value, this patch looks
> good to me.
>
It was not moved ;) platform_device_register() is and was in front of
platform_device_unregister. But because the new platform_device_del()
reused most of the platform_device_unregister() body patch plays a trick
on you making you believe that some code was moved around.
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-12-10 17:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-12-10 6:36 [patch 0/2] Add platform_device_del() Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-10 6:36 ` [patch 1/2] " Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-10 16:58 ` Jean Delvare
2005-12-10 17:47 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-12-10 6:36 ` [patch 2/2] Rearrange exports in platform.c Dmitry Torokhov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox