From: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: [DOC PATCH] block/stat.txt
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 17:03:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051211010339.GA26568@hexapodia.org> (raw)
I couldn't find any docs explaining the contents of
/sys/block/<dev>/stat, so I wrote up the following. I'm not completely
sure it's accurate - Jens, could you give a yea or nay on this?
In particular, the counts of read/write IOs and read/write sectors are
incremented in different places - it looks like they both increment as
the request is being finished, but I'm not completely sure of that.
-andy
---
# HG changeset patch
# User adi@bobble.hexapodia.org
# Node ID 28202adc17846b087209ce937fa5cd0f2f4ffbbb
# Parent 03055821672a46deb8291db0cf719e39c2f0d48e
Documentation/block/stat.txt: document contents of /sys/block/<dev>/stat
diff -r 03055821672a -r 28202adc1784 Documentation/block/stat.txt
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/Documentation/block/stat.txt Sat Dec 10 15:19:56 2005 -0800
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+Block layer statistics in /sys/block/<dev>/stat
+===============================================
+
+This file documents the contents of the /sys/block/<dev>/stat file.
+
+The stat file provides several statistics about the state of block
+device <dev>.
+
+Q. Why are there multiple statistics in a single file? Doesn't sysfs
+ normally contain a single value per file?
+A. By having a single file, the kernel can guarantee that the statistics
+ represent a consistent snapshot of the state of the device. If the
+ statistics were exported as multiple files containing one statistic
+ each, it would be impossible to guarantee that a set of readings
+ represent a single point in time.
+
+The stat file consists of a single line of text containing 11 decimal
+values separated by whitespace. The fields are summarized in the
+following table, and described in more detail below.
+
+Name units description
+---- ----- -----------
+read I/Os requests number of read I/Os processed
+read merges requests number of read I/Os merged with in-queue I/O
+read sectors blocks number of sectors read
+read ticks milliseconds total wait time for read requests
+write I/Os requests number of write I/Os processed
+write merges requests number of write I/Os merged with in-queue I/O
+write sectors blocks number of sectors written
+write ticks milliseconds total wait time for write requests
+in_flight requests number of I/Os currently in flight
+io_ticks milliseconds total time this block device has been active
+time_in_queue milliseconds total wait time for all requests
+
+read I/Os, write I/Os
+=====================
+
+These values increment when an I/O request completes.
+
+read merges, write merges
+=========================
+
+These values increment when an I/O request is merged with an
+already-queued I/O request.
+
+read sectors, write sectors
+===========================
+
+These values count the number of blocks read from or written to this
+block device. The "blocks" in question are the standard UNIX 512-byte
+blocks, not any device-specific block size. The counters are
+incremented when the I/O completes.
+
+read ticks, write ticks
+=======================
+
+These values count the number of milliseconds that I/O requests have
+waited on this block device. If there are multiple I/O requests waiting,
+these values will increase at a rate greater than 1000/second; for
+example, if 60 read requests wait for an average of 30 ms, the read_ticks
+field will increase by 60*30 = 1800.
+
+in_flight
+=========
+
+This value counts the number of currently-queued I/O requests.
+
+io_ticks
+========
+
+This value counts the number of milliseconds during which the device has
+had I/O requests queued.
+
+time_in_queue
+=============
+
+This value counts the number of milliseconds that I/O requests have waited
+on this block device. If there are multiple I/O requests waiting, this
+value will increase as the product of the number of milliseconds times the
+number of requests waiting (see "read ticks" above for an example).
next reply other threads:[~2005-12-11 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-11 1:03 Andy Isaacson [this message]
2005-12-12 12:45 ` [DOC PATCH] block/stat.txt Jens Axboe
2005-12-13 8:41 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-13 18:38 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051211010339.GA26568@hexapodia.org \
--to=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox