public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: CaT <cat@zip.com.au>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: anticipatory scheduler and raid rebuild
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:23:30 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051213052329.GM4212@zip.com.au> (raw)

I'll be able to play a bit more with this later but for now I thought
I'd toss it into the wilderness. 

I had jsut setup a nice little server with WD 10k drives and s/w raid 1.
The kernel is 2.6.14.3. The CPU is a p4 3Ghz and it's an Intel 82875P
chipset. In order to test that it'll build ok with missing disks I
pulled one out, booted, shutdown, put it back in and rebooted. I then
went on to try and get one of the raids to rebuild with:

mdadm --manage -a /dev/md6 /dev/sdb8

And then the server slowed to a crawl. Well not even that. It slowed to
the point of freezing and occasionally stuttering with activity other
then the rebuild. I got a similar reaction when it was rebuilding it.
Essentially, whilst the rebuild was in progress no disk io or even /sys
and /proc io could be done then a flurry of excitement and then back to
the freeze.

I then remembered that I could change schedulers on the disks and so did
the following (having read cfq is a nice choice):

echo cfq >/sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler
echo cfq >/sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler

And the system became usable right after the commends were allowed to
pass through. Whilst the load (when I could get a reading) was 8+ before
it now hangs around 0.8-1 and the system is very responsive. The rebuild
speed is slower now; 25k vs 40-50k before.

So, does my hardware suck and AS is pushing it beyond its limits or is
AS unsuitable for the task I am putting it through or is AS buggy and
all should be well with it?

-- 
    "To the extent that we overreact, we proffer the terrorists the
    greatest tribute."
    	- High Court Judge Michael Kirby

             reply	other threads:[~2005-12-13  5:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-13  5:23 CaT [this message]
2005-12-18 23:36 ` anticipatory scheduler and raid rebuild Neil Brown
2005-12-19  1:18   ` CaT
2005-12-19  4:43     ` CaT

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051213052329.GM4212@zip.com.au \
    --to=cat@zip.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox