Re: [stable] RE: [patch 10/26] ACPI: Prefer _CST over FADT for C-state capabilities

Greg KH
2005-12-13T21:50:19Z

On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:56:26PM -0500, Brown, Len wrote:
> yes, the 3rd patch should go with the first two.
> I asked Linus to pull the 3rd patch upstream
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/6/32
> but this was just as he cut -rc5 and headed out for a week.
>
> Linus,
> Can you pull that patch upstream before cutting 2.6.15?
>
> Thanks Daniel for the follow-up,

Can someone send the patch to stable@ when it goes in so I can include
it in the next round? I've moved the other two acpi patches for the
next release, pending this patch.

thanks,

greg k-h