From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] m68k: compile fix - hardirq checks were in wrong place
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:54:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051215085402.GT27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
Move the sanity check for NR_IRQS being no more than 1<<HARDIRQ_BITS
from asm-m68k/hardirq.h to asm-m68k/irq.h; needed since NR_IRQS is
not necessary know at the points of inclusion of asm/hardirq.h due
to the rather ugly header dependencies on m68k. Fix is by far simpler
than trying to massage those dependencies...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
include/asm-m68k/hardirq.h | 9 ---------
include/asm-m68k/irq.h | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
69139a634877359d1bd7b19c2862c9a01468b614
diff --git a/include/asm-m68k/hardirq.h b/include/asm-m68k/hardirq.h
index 728318b..5e1c582 100644
--- a/include/asm-m68k/hardirq.h
+++ b/include/asm-m68k/hardirq.h
@@ -14,13 +14,4 @@ typedef struct {
#define HARDIRQ_BITS 8
-/*
- * The hardirq mask has to be large enough to have
- * space for potentially all IRQ sources in the system
- * nesting on a single CPU:
- */
-#if (1 << HARDIRQ_BITS) < NR_IRQS
-# error HARDIRQ_BITS is too low!
-#endif
-
#endif
diff --git a/include/asm-m68k/irq.h b/include/asm-m68k/irq.h
index 1f56990..d312674 100644
--- a/include/asm-m68k/irq.h
+++ b/include/asm-m68k/irq.h
@@ -23,6 +23,15 @@
#endif
/*
+ * The hardirq mask has to be large enough to have
+ * space for potentially all IRQ sources in the system
+ * nesting on a single CPU:
+ */
+#if (1 << HARDIRQ_BITS) < NR_IRQS
+# error HARDIRQ_BITS is too low!
+#endif
+
+/*
* Interrupt source definitions
* General interrupt sources are the level 1-7.
* Adding an interrupt service routine for one of these sources
--
0.99.9.GIT
next reply other threads:[~2005-12-15 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-15 8:54 Al Viro [this message]
2005-12-15 11:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] m68k: compile fix - hardirq checks were in wrong place Roman Zippel
2005-12-15 12:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-15 12:33 ` Roman Zippel
2005-12-15 16:47 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051215085402.GT27946@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox