From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750913AbVLOTrZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:47:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750961AbVLOTrZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:47:25 -0500 Received: from free.hands.com ([83.142.228.128]:41448 "EHLO free.hands.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750913AbVLOTrY (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:47:24 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:47:01 +0000 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ordering of suspend/resume for devices. any clues, anyone? Message-ID: <20051215194701.GG14978@lkcl.net> References: <20051215143124.GD14978@lkcl.net> <20051215183744.GB16574@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051215183744.GB16574@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-hands-com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: lkcl@lkcl.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 10:37:44AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > am seeking some advice regarding power management - specifically > > the ordering of devices "resume" functions being called. > > > > possible solutions, as i see them: > > > > Known issue, I'd take this to the linux-pm mailing list instead, as the > people there are working on stuff for this. thanks greg. l.