From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
dada1@cosmobay.com,
"Shai Fultheim (Shai@scalex86.org)" <shai@scalex86.org>
Subject: Re: [discuss] [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- node local pda allocation
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:55:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051216035539.GA3736@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051216001934.GN23384@wotan.suse.de>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 01:19:34AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> And for the APs you allocate the PDA in smpboot.c before actually sending
> the startup IPI to the AP.
You mean wakeup_secondary_via_INIT, called by do_boot_cpu?
That is too late. sched_init happens much earlier, and the per-cpu offset
table for all AP cpus not present is referenced, and I hit an early exception.
sched_init is executed on the BP very early and sched_init does this:
for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
prio_array_t *array;
rq = cpu_rq(i);
The cpu_rq macro ends up needing per-cpu offset table stored in cpu_pda of
the AP cpus, even before we hit the code to send startup IPIs.
(#define __per_cpu_offset(cpu) (cpu_pda[cpu].data_offset))
This is way before slab is ready. So I either use alloc_bootmem before
sched_init in setup_arch, or keep the static boot_cpu_pda.
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Kiran
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-16 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-15 2:33 [patch 1/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- early cpu_to_node Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-15 2:35 ` [patch 2/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- cpu_pda_prep Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-15 2:37 ` [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- node local pda allocation Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-15 8:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-15 9:36 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-15 9:42 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-12-15 18:47 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-16 0:19 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-16 3:55 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai [this message]
2005-12-15 9:44 ` [discuss] [patch 1/3] x86_64: Node local pda take 2 -- early cpu_to_node Andi Kleen
2005-12-15 19:01 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-16 0:20 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-16 8:11 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051216035539.GA3736@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmobay.com \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shai@scalex86.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox