Re: [PATCH 03/13] [RFC] ipath copy routines

Robert Walsh
2005-12-18T19:52:14Z

> > That would make sense. Give it a non-ipath-related name and require that
> > all architectures which wish to run this driver must implement that
> > (documented) function.
> >
> > And, in Kconfig, make sure that architectures which don't implement that
> > library function do not attempt to build this driver. To avoid breaking
> > `make allmodconfig'.
>
> How about we implement a portable version in C that you get
> by default if you don't implement the assembler routine?
> Pretty please? :-)

Sure. :-)

--
Robert Walsh Email: rjwalsh@pathscale.com
PathScale, Inc. Phone: +1 650 934 8117
2071 Stierlin Court, Suite 200 Fax: +1 650 428 1969
Mountain View, CA 94043.