From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030254AbVLSEag (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:30:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030255AbVLSEag (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:30:36 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:62155 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030254AbVLSEaf (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:30:35 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:30:32 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven , Steven Rostedt , Alan Cox , Christoph Hellwig , Andi Kleen , David Howells , Alexander Viro , Oleg Nesterov , Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [patch 09/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, mutex-migration-helper-x86_64.patch Message-ID: <20051219043032.GH23384@wotan.suse.de> References: <20051219013827.GE28038@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051219013827.GE28038@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 02:38:27AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > introduce the arch_semaphore type on x86_64, to ease migration to > mutexes. As a small feedback I don't think the name arch_semaphore is very good because it means nothing. How about counting_semaphore which is what it actually is? -Andi