From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: paulmck@us.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, dada1@cosmosbay.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au,
Simon.Derr@bull.net, ak@suse.de, Greg Edwards <edwardsg@sgi.com>,
clameter@sgi.com
Subject: CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT (was: [PATCH 04/04] Cpuset: skip rcu check ...)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:04:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051219080401.861acca2.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051219064810.0ec403ee.pj@sgi.com>
pj wrote:
> instead consider removing CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT from at least sn2
Ah - perhaps not so. Adding my SGI colleague Greg Edwards to the cc
list. My email archives suggest that he enabled CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
in ia64 sn2_defconfig a few months ago, and I presume did so intentionally.
The change enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT was:
user: Greg Edwards <edwardsg@sgi.com>
date: Tue Aug 16 23:38:16 2005 +0011
summary: [IA64] Refresh arch/ia64/configs/sn2_defconfig.
Greg - CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT adds a couple of pages of assembly code
due to various BUG checks beneath rcu_read_lock() on some hot code
paths (which is where rcu is most popular). See the two calls
add_preempt_count() and sub_preempt_count() in kernel/sched.c.
Was this intentional to enable CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT in sn2_defconfig?
Other evidence opposing this DEBUG opttion:
Most other DEBUG options are turned off in the defconfigs.
Other evidence supporting setting this DEBUG option:
We're not the only arch enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT. See also:
collie simpad s390 se7705
lpd7a400 bigsur dreamcast sh03
lpd7a404 microdev systemh mx1ads
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-19 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-14 8:40 [PATCH 01/04] Cpuset: remove rcu slab cache optimization Paul Jackson
2005-12-14 8:40 ` [PATCH 02/04] Cpuset: use rcu directly optimization Paul Jackson
2005-12-16 17:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-12-16 20:22 ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-14 8:40 ` [PATCH 03/04] Cpuset: mark number_of_cpusets read_mostly Paul Jackson
2005-12-14 8:40 ` [PATCH 04/04] Cpuset: skip rcu check if task is in root cpuset Paul Jackson
2005-12-16 17:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-12-16 20:06 ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-17 16:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-12-19 14:48 ` Paul Jackson
2005-12-19 16:04 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2005-12-19 16:39 ` CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT (was: [PATCH 04/04] Cpuset: skip rcu check ...) Greg Edwards
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051219080401.861acca2.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=edwardsg@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox