From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:57:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051219205741.GA24004@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051219203206.GC20824@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
* Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> However, the argument _against_ making things generic is that they
> become less optimised for specific architectures. I'm still not
> convinced that the genirq stuff is as optimal for ARM as the existing
> code is, so I've little motivation to move to the genirq stuff.
> (Though I will try to make things easier for those who would like to.)
i'm quite convinced that the final phase of the genirq conversion will
work out fine: because it mostly meant the conceptual adoption of your
ARM IRQ layer (the irqchips approach), with compatibility mechanisms for
all the other arches, with some minor SMP improvements ontop of it. So
i'd be surprised if you found _that_ one inadequate :-) If there's any
detail that ARM doesnt need, i'm sure we can find a non-runtime solution
for it. But i think i digress.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-19 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-19 1:34 [patch 00/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 4:22 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-19 4:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19 4:31 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-19 6:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-19 12:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19 16:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 15:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-19 19:25 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2005-12-19 19:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-21 16:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-10 10:28 ` Balbir Singh
2006-01-10 18:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-11 6:33 ` Balbir Singh
2006-01-11 9:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-12-19 20:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 20:19 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2005-12-19 20:32 ` Russell King
2005-12-19 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-12-19 19:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 20:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-19 23:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-20 8:03 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-20 8:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-20 8:21 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-20 8:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-20 8:48 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-19 16:22 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051219205741.GA24004@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjanv@infradead.org \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox