From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 10/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, mutex-migration-helper-core.patch
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 05:48:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051220044823.GA567@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051219150007.GA9809@infradead.org>
* Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 02:38:37AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > introduce the mutex_debug type, and switch the semaphore APIs to it in a
> > type-sensitive way. Plain semaphores will still use the proper
> > arch-semaphore calls.
>
> I think we shouldn't introduce this one. It just encourages people to do
> really things.
^---("weird" ?)
ok. I can keep it a separate patch - it's needed for -rt, and it's also
a good debugging tool to test-drive the mutex implementation.
historically, i found 90% of the mutex.c bugs by stress-testing it from
userspace, but a crutial 10% did come from the DEBUG_MUTEX_FULL mode,
where almost all of the 7000+ semaphore users are switched over to
mutexes.
but in terms of keeping the upstream kernel code base clean, i agree
with a clean and separate set of mutex APIs that are introduced into
subsystems gradually.
> Everything else in the patchseries looks sensible to me.
great!
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-20 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-19 1:38 [patch 10/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, mutex-migration-helper-core.patch Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 14:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19 16:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 14:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19 16:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 14:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19 16:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-19 15:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 4:48 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051220044823.GA567@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjanv@infradead.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox