Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?

Pekka Enberg
2006-01-02T08:46:51Z

Hi,

On 12/30/05, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> Attached is a variant that was refreshed against 2.6.15-rc7 and fixes
> the logical bug that your compile error fix made ;)
>
> It should be cachep->objsize not csizep->cs_size.

Isn't there any other way to do this patch other than making kzalloc()
and kstrdup() inline? I would like to see something like this in the
mainline but making them inline is not acceptable because they
increase kernel text a lot.

Pekka