Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?

Folkert van Heusden
2005-12-21T19:36:36Z

> > > Your results are interesting : size-32 seems to use objects of size 64 !
> > > > size-32 1538 2714 64 <<HERE>>
> > > So I guess that size-32 cache could be avoided at least for EMT (I take you
> > > run a 64 bits kernel ?)
> > I think I do yes:
> > Linux xxxxx 2.4.21-37.EL #1 SMP Wed Sep 7 13:32:18 EDT 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > It is a redhat 4 x64 system.
> Looks more like RHEL3 judging from the kernel version.

Ehr yes, you're totally right.

Folkert van Heusden

--
Try MultiTail! Multiple windows with logfiles, filtered with regular
expressions, colored output, etc. etc. www.vanheusden.com/multitail/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your PGP/GPG key signed at www.biglumber.com!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com