From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@infradead.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@trained-monkey.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/8] mutex subsystem, add atomic_*_call_if_*() to i386
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:32:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051221203243.GA19082@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512211054450.4827@g5.osdl.org>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:57:40AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Actually (and re-reading the email I sent that wasn't obvious at all), my
> _preferred_ fix is to literally force the use of the above kind of
> function: not save/restore %eax at all, but just say that any function
> that is called by the magic "atomic_*_call_if()" needs to always return
> the argument it gets as its return value too.
>
> That allows the caller to not even have to care. And the callee obviously
> already _has_ that value, so it might as well return it (and in the best
> case it's not going to add any cost at all, either to the caller or the
> callee).
>
> So you might opt to keep the asm the same, just change the calling
> conventions.
This new macro is only going to be used in x86-specific files, right?
There's no practical way to implement this on lots of other
architectures.
Embedding a call in asm("") can break other things too - for instance,
unwind tables could become inaccurate.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-21 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-21 15:54 [patch 3/8] mutex subsystem, add atomic_*_call_if_*() to i386 Ingo Molnar
2005-12-21 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-21 18:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-21 20:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-21 20:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-12-21 20:54 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-22 9:18 ` Keith Owens
2005-12-21 19:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-21 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-21 22:37 Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051221203243.GA19082@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjanv@infradead.org \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jes@trained-monkey.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox