From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ordering of suspend/resume for devices. any clues, anyone?
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:49:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051221224939.GI8496@lkcl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051221102109.GB1735@elf.ucw.cz>
heya pavel,
thanks for the tip. as it turns out, a function table was hacked-n
that back-link from the w100fb framebuffer resume function into the
LCD code.
in this way, it is possible to call functions in the LCD module
doing GPIO to start the power-up sequence required for the
LCD and backlight, wait a few ms, initialise the video chip
(in the w100fb code), then call _another_ set of functions in
the LCD module to finish off the initialisation.
not pretty, but there you go.
l.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:21:09AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > [hi, please kindly cc me direct as i am deliberately subscribed with
> > settings to not receive posts from this list, but if that is inconvenient
> > for you to cc me, don't worry i can always look up the archives
> > to keep track of replies, thank you.]
> >
> > http://handhelds.org/moin/moin.cgi/BlueAngel
> >
> > works.
> >
> > am seeking some advice regarding power management - specifically
> > the ordering of devices "resume" functions being called.
> >
> > we have an LCD, and an ATI chip. switching on the LCD powers up
> > the ATI chip.
> >
> > unfortunately, resume calls the ATI device initialisation
> > _before_ the LCD resume initialisation. the ATI chip's
> > initialisation fails - naturally - because it's not even
> > powered up.
>
> I'd say "make LCD system/platform device". That will init it first,
> shut it down last.
> Pavel
>
> --
> Thanks, Sharp!
--
--
<a href="http://lkcl.net">http://lkcl.net</a>
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-21 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-15 14:31 ordering of suspend/resume for devices. any clues, anyone? Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2005-12-15 18:37 ` Greg KH
2005-12-15 19:47 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2005-12-21 10:21 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-21 22:49 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051221224939.GI8496@lkcl.net \
--to=lkcl@lkcl.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox