From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: remove incorrect dependancy on CONFIG_APM
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:11:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051223031142.GA23891@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051223022227.GB27537@redhat.com>
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:22:27PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > CC arch/i386/kernel/apm.o
> > arch/i386/kernel/apm.c: In function 'apm_init':
> > arch/i386/kernel/apm.c:2304: error: 'pm_active' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > arch/i386/kernel/apm.c:2304: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > arch/i386/kernel/apm.c:2304: error: for each function it appears in.)
> > arch/i386/kernel/apm.c: In function 'apm_exit':
> > arch/i386/kernel/apm.c:2410: error: 'pm_active' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > make[1]: *** [arch/i386/kernel/apm.o] Error 1
> >
> > <-- snip -->
> >
> > If PM_LEGACY causes user confusion for APM users, commit
> > bca73e4bf8563d83f7856164caa44d5f42e44cca should be reverted.
>
> Yeah, I realised that earlier too, my change was untested.
>
> Hrmph. For now I've enabled PM_LEGACY, but silently taking options
> away like this is what surprises users.
Living dangerously with another not-compile-tested patch.
(It's building right now, but I'm about to go eat, and
with my goldfish like attention span, I'll forget about it later)
The ifdef's are a bit ugly, but given it's a legacy interface,
maybe pm_active & co will all go away completely one day.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
--- linux-2.6.14/arch/i386/Kconfig~ 2005-12-22 22:06:10.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.14/arch/i386/Kconfig 2005-12-22 22:06:16.000000000 -0500
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ depends on PM && !X86_VISWS
config APM
tristate "APM (Advanced Power Management) BIOS support"
- depends on PM && PM_LEGACY
+ depends on PM
---help---
APM is a BIOS specification for saving power using several different
techniques. This is mostly useful for battery powered laptops with
--- linux-2.6.14/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c~ 2005-12-22 21:53:43.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.14/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2005-12-22 21:54:02.000000000 -0500
@@ -2301,7 +2301,9 @@ static int __init apm_init(void)
apm_info.disabled = 1;
return -ENODEV;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_LEGACY
pm_active = 1;
+#endif
/*
* Set up a segment that references the real mode segment 0x40
@@ -2407,7 +2409,9 @@ static void __exit apm_exit(void)
exit_kapmd = 1;
while (kapmd_running)
schedule();
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_LEGACY
pm_active = 0;
+#endif
}
module_init(apm_init);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-23 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-20 21:21 remove incorrect dependancy on CONFIG_APM Dave Jones
2005-12-23 2:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-23 2:22 ` Dave Jones
2005-12-23 3:11 ` Dave Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051223031142.GA23891@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox