From: Marc Lehmann <schmorp@schmorp.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: read returns EAGAIN on a _blocking_ socket, but should not?
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:16:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051225151611.GA20443@schmorp.de> (raw)
Hi!
The SuS documents EAGAIN for read(2) as:
[EAGAIN]
The O_NONBLOCK flag is set for the file descriptor and the thread would
be delayed.
And the linux manpage for read(2) says something similar. Yet, I do get
EAGAIN when reading from a blocking socket. Here is a short strace:
socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 3
connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/serv"}, 110) = 0
write(3, "\0\3", 2) = 2
write(3, "NEW", 3) = 3
... many writes and reads omitted
sendmsg(3, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{"\0", 1}], msg_controllen=20, {cmsg_len=20, cmsg_level=SOL_SOCKET, cmsg_type=SCM_RIGHTS, {3}}, msg_flags=MSG_OOB|MSG_DONTROUTE}, 0) = 1
read(3, "\0\3", 2) = 2
read(3, 0x51d030, 3) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
write(2, "protocol error: unexpected eof f"..., 44) = 44
(the sendmsg call in the source, incidentally, specifies "0" as flags
argument, not MSG_OOB|MSG_DONTROUTE, but this is likely irrelevant).
Here is the server side for the last exchange above:
recvmsg(9, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{"\0", 1}], msg_controllen=24, {cmsg_len=20, cmsg_level=SOL_SOCKET, cmsg_type=SCM_RIGHTS, {10}}, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 1
... ioctls on other fds omitted
write(9, "\0\3", 2) = 2
write(9, "END", 3) = 3
Now, the first backtrace creates a unix domain socket, connects to an
existing one, passes a file descriptor and then read() returns with
EAGAIN. Nowhere does it set the socket to blocking.
The full backtraces can be found as http://data.plan9.de/x.20407 (client
getting EAGAIN) and at http://data.plan9.de/x.20406 (server writing).
I am looking for the obvious logical error I made, but I can only
come up with the conclusion that read returning EAGAIN on a blocking
socket must be a kernel bug. It is also interesting that this code and
the server/client exchanges worked reliably _until_ I started to pass
filehandles from client to server.
I am using linux 2.6.14 on x86_64.
Thanks for your time and any insights you can give!
--
The choice of a
-----==- _GNU_
----==-- _ generation Marc Lehmann
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ pcg@goof.com
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / http://schmorp.de/
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE
next reply other threads:[~2005-12-25 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-25 15:16 Marc Lehmann [this message]
2005-12-25 16:17 ` read returns EAGAIN on a _blocking_ socket, but should not? (solved) Marc Lehmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051225151611.GA20443@schmorp.de \
--to=schmorp@schmorp.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox