From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750912AbVLYUnQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:43:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750917AbVLYUnQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:43:16 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:65248 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750900AbVLYUnQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:43:16 -0500 Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 20:43:13 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Kees Cook Cc: James Lamanna , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trivial@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: zlib_inflate "r.base" uninitialized compile warnings Message-ID: <20051225204313.GD27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20051225203531.GN18040@outflux.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051225203531.GN18040@outflux.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 12:35:32PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 12:08:00PM -0800, James Lamanna wrote: > > What version of gcc are you using? > > gcc (GCC) 4.0.3 20051201 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-5) > > > Looks like a gcc bug that was fixed? > > I guess it's been introduced. ;) 4.0.x is very bad in that area - it's crying "wolf" a _lot_ and genuine cases of uninitialized variables being used are drowning in the noise; compared to 3.x it's a serious regression.