From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750814AbVLZW1a (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:27:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750792AbVLZW1P (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:27:15 -0500 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:28064 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750804AbVLZW1N (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:27:13 -0500 From: Roman Zippel To: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/36] m68k: fix macro syntax to make current binutils happy Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:59:18 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512262259.19230.zippel@linux-m68k.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thursday 22 December 2005 05:49, Al Viro wrote: > recent as(1) doesn't think that . terminates a macro name, so > getuser.l is _not_ treated as invoking getuser with .l as the > first argument. Could you please hold back with the binutils changes? Eventually this should rather be fixed in gas or they have to properly document the expected behaviour, so it doesn't break the next time they change it. bye, Roman