From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964825AbVL1O3w (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:29:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964826AbVL1O3v (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:29:51 -0500 Received: from waste.org ([64.81.244.121]:48270 "EHLO waste.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964825AbVL1O3v (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:29:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:26:21 -0600 From: Matt Mackall To: Ingo Molnar Cc: lkml , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [patch 01/2] allow gcc4 to control inlining Message-ID: <20051228142621.GJ3356@waste.org> References: <20051228114653.GB3003@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051228114653.GB3003@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 12:46:53PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > allow gcc4 compilers to decide what to inline and what not - instead > of the kernel forcing gcc to inline all the time. > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar > Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven I'm ever so slightly wary of GCC 4's stack size logic for functions with nested scopes, but I think we'll have no trouble catching any trouble cases in 2.6.16-rc. Acked-by: Matt Mackall -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.