public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 02/2] allow gcc4 to optimize unit-at-a-time
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:41:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051228154138.GA18798@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p734q4tb5na.fsf@verdi.suse.de>


* Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:

> But one caveat: turning on unit-at-a-time makes objdump -S / make 
> foo/bar.lst with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO essentially useless because objdump 
> cannot deal with functions being out of order in the object file. This 
> can be a big problem while analyzing oopses - essentially you have to 
> analyze the functions without source level information. And with 
> unit-at-a-time they become bigger so it's more difficult.
> 
> But I still think it's a good idea.

hm, i dont seem to have problems with DEBUG_INFO. I picked a random 
address within the kernel:

c035766f T schedule_timeout

(gdb) list *0xc035768f
0xc035768f is in schedule_timeout (kernel/timer.c:1075).
1070                     * should never happens anyway). You just have the printk()
1071                     * that will tell you if something is gone wrong and where.
1072                     */
1073                    if (timeout < 0)
1074                    {
1075                            printk(KERN_ERR "schedule_timeout: wrong timeout "
1076                                    "value %lx from %p\n", timeout,
1077                                    __builtin_return_address(0));
1078                            current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
1079                            goto out;
(gdb)

or is it something else that breaks?

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-12-28 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-28 11:47 [patch 02/2] allow gcc4 to optimize unit-at-a-time Ingo Molnar
2005-12-28 12:04 ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-12-28 12:28   ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-12-28 13:04     ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-12-28 12:47       ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-12-28 12:50         ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-12-28 13:06   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-28 15:30 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-28 15:34   ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-28 15:41   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-12-28 17:46     ` Andreas Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051228154138.GA18798@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox