Re: [PATCH] ipw2200 stack reduction

Pekka Enberg
2005-12-29T10:39:26Z

Hi,

On 12/29/05, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
> Well you could do that if you wanted, but 500 bytes of dynamic
> allocation is not a big issue. But it could be an optimization on top of
> this patch, indeed. The downside is that you then have to do 2
> allocations for each command, so whether it would be a win or not I
> don't know.

The allocation shouldn't make much difference but for the implicit
memset() smaller size is a win maybe?

Pekka