From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:17:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051229101736.GA2560@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051229100233.GA12056@redhat.com>
* Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> > could test it by e.g. trying to reproduce the same VM latency as in the
> > -rt tree. [the two zlib patches are needed if you are using 4K stacks,
> > mcount increases stack footprint.]
>
> kernel/latency.c: In function 'add_preempt_count_ti':
> kernel/latency.c:1703: warning: implicit declaration of function 'preempt_count_ti'
> kernel/latency.c:1703: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
> kernel/latency.c: In function 'sub_preempt_count_ti':
> kernel/latency.c:1764: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
indeed - i have fixed this and have uploaded a new version to:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/latency-tracing-patches/
> interesting config options ...
>
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL=y
>
> CONFIG_WAKEUP_TIMING=y
> CONFIG_WAKEUP_LATENCY_HIST=y
> CONFIG_CRITICAL_IRQSOFF_TIMING=y
> CONFIG_INTERRUPT_OFF_HIST=y
> CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE=y
> CONFIG_USE_FRAME_POINTER=y
> CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y
these are various things one might be interested in gathering on a live
system. Enabling more of them means higher runtime overhead.
WAKEUP_TIMING only measures the worst-case wakeup cost, it's the
lowest-overhead option. It's activated via resetting the worst-case
cost:
echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/preempt_max_latency
The histogram ones are gathering a histogram (but no traces) into
/proc/latency_hist/<cpu_nr>. These have some overhead as they hook into
every preempt-disable/enable call. Output is:
$ head -15 /proc/latency_hist/wakeup_latency/CPU0
#Minimum latency: 2 microseconds.
#Average latency: 7 microseconds.
#Maximum latency: 511 microseconds.
#Total samples: 5241
#There are 0 samples greater or equal than 10240 microseconds
#usecs samples
0 0
1 0
2 7
3 2041
4 921
5 194
6 62
7 502
8 119
...
The LATENCY_TRACING option does full tracing of critical sections
[driven by e.g. WAKEUP_TIMING - but it can also be activated by
interrupts, or be completely user-driven via userspace calls], which
trace is then put into /proc/latency_trace - mcount done for every
function call in the kernel. This can add up to 30% of runtime overhead
[or worse], but is obviously very useful for debugging latencies.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-29 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-27 23:31 2.6.15-rc5: latency regression vs 2.6.14 in exit_mmap->free_pgtables Lee Revell
2005-12-28 2:46 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-28 22:59 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-29 0:00 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-29 8:22 ` [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7 Ingo Molnar
2005-12-29 10:02 ` Dave Jones
2005-12-29 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-12-29 20:11 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-29 20:26 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-29 20:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-29 22:18 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-30 0:08 ` Grant Coady
2005-12-30 0:18 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-30 0:42 ` Grant Coady
2005-12-30 8:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-30 16:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-02 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-19 1:49 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-19 6:17 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31 0:20 ` Grant Coady
2005-12-30 2:16 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-30 8:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-30 18:51 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31 0:51 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31 0:59 ` Mark Knecht
2005-12-31 1:16 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31 1:30 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31 1:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-31 1:15 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31 1:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-31 3:54 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31 4:00 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31 4:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-12-31 4:54 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31 20:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-01 5:46 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-01 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-01 19:02 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-01 19:06 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-03 11:12 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-03 13:28 ` David Lang
2006-01-03 14:11 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-03 14:09 ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-03 15:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-12-31 4:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-01 8:32 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-06 20:28 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-29 0:54 ` 2.6.15-rc5: latency regression vs 2.6.14 in exit_mmap->free_pgtables Lee Revell
2006-01-19 1:42 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-19 7:29 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-19 7:32 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-19 7:35 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051229101736.GA2560@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox