From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Bradley Reed <bradreed1@gmail.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MPlayer broken under 2.6.15-rc7-rt1?
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 12:50:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060101115038.GR3811@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060101115121.034e6bb7@galactus.example.org>
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 11:51:21AM +0200, Bradley Reed wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 10:14:21 +0100
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 20:29 +0200, Bradley Reed wrote:
> > > I have tried MPlayer versions 1.0pre6, 1.0pre7, and cvs from today
> > > and they all work fine under 2.6.14 and 2.6.14-rt21/22.
> > >
> > > I booted into 2.6.15-rc7-rt1 and the same MPlayer binaries segfault
> > > on every video I try and play. Yes, I have nvidia modules loaded,
> > > so won't get much help, but thought someone might like to know.
> >
> >
> > you know, you could have done a little bit more effort and reproduced
> > this without the binary crud... it's not that hard you know and it
> > shows that you actually care about the problem enough that you want
> > to make it worthwhile for people to look into it.
> >
>
> And you could have saved the time and effort of replying, as you had
> nothing useful to say. Why do you expect kernel users (non-developers)
> to jump through hoops and cripple their systems in order to provide bug
> reports? Exactly how could I have tested MPLayer realistically without
> Xv support? It isn't that easy to swap video cards in a laptop.
>...
MPlayer has more than enough output drivers including some that work
without the nvidia module.
If your problem was an RTC one, it might have even trigger using the
AAlib output driver.
> DO YOU REALLY PREFER USERS NOT REPORT BUGS?
There are _many_ new bug reports every day and too few developers with
too few spare time to go through all of them.
A binary-only module can do _anything_ even at module load time, and
_noone_ except people with access to the source code can debug such
problems.
Many developers know how it feels if after spending hours on debugging a
problem someone reported it turned out "oh, it goes away if I remove the
nvidia/vmware/... module".
It usually takes two parties to get a bug found:
A developer willing to look into it and a user willing to provide any
assistance for the developer.
The latter might include 10 reboots with different kernel patches
applied, and compared to that it's not a big issue to boot in these
cases without binary-only modules ever loaded. Your system might be
crippled, but only for the time you are helping the developer to
identify your problem.
> Brad
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-01 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-31 18:29 MPlayer broken under 2.6.15-rc7-rt1? Bradley Reed
2005-12-31 18:47 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-12-31 18:59 ` Bradley Reed
2005-12-31 19:14 ` Alistair John Strachan
2005-12-31 19:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-31 20:07 ` Bradley Reed
2005-12-31 20:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-31 20:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2005-12-31 22:46 ` RTC broken under 2.6.15-rc7-rt1 (was: Re: MPlayer broken under 2.6.15-rc7-rt1?) Steven Rostedt
2005-12-31 23:22 ` Bradley Reed
2006-01-01 0:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-01 9:14 ` MPlayer broken under 2.6.15-rc7-rt1? Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-01 9:51 ` Bradley Reed
2006-01-01 11:26 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-01 12:12 ` jerome lacoste
2006-01-01 12:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-02 9:57 ` [OT] " jerome lacoste
2006-01-01 13:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-01 14:21 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2006-01-01 17:50 ` Prakash Punnoor
2006-01-01 11:50 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
[not found] ` <20060101145402.0c6292bb@galactus.example.org>
2006-01-01 13:16 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-01 13:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-01 13:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-01 15:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-01 15:24 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-01 14:31 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-01 18:57 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-01 21:33 ` Keith Owens
2006-01-01 22:57 ` Alistair John Strachan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-31 18:18 Bradley Reed
2005-12-31 19:09 ` Mark Knecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060101115038.GR3811@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bradreed1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox