From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964839AbWACXGZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:06:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964801AbWACXGZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:06:25 -0500 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:63908 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964839AbWACXGY (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:06:24 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Jesper Juhl Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Optimize select/poll by putting small data sets on the stack Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 00:07:08 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: linux-kernel References: <200601032158.14057.ak@suse.de> <9a8748490601031422x2cd586f3vd8849723b659820e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9a8748490601031422x2cd586f3vd8849723b659820e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601040007.08747.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 03 January 2006 23:22, Jesper Juhl wrote: > Got an easy way to benchmark this? > I'd like to test it on my box and provide some feedback, but I'd need > a way to benchmark, and if you have an easy way to do that already > figured out it would save me having to write my own :) I have a simple micro benchmark, but I don't think it makes sense to repeat these measurements (they are not very interesting) I'm mostly interested in functional testing- e.g. does it break anything for you? -Andi