public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] i386: enable 4k stacks by default
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:58:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060104165835.GP3831@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490601040849l5e144f18s381854dd7f5f6e6b@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:49:25PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 1/4/06, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:39:14PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > On 1/4/06, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > > > This patch enables 4k stacks by default.
> > > >
> > > > 4k stacks have become a well-tested feature used fore a long time in
> > > > Fedora and even in RHEL 4.
> > > >
> > > > There are no known problems in in-kernel code with 4k stacks still
> > > > present after Neil's patch that went into -mm nearly two months ago.
> > > >
> > > > Defaulting to 4k stacks in -mm kernel will give some more testing
> > > > coverage and should show whether there are really no problems left.
> > > >
> > > > Keeping the option for now should make the people happy who want to use
> > > > the experimental -mm kernel but don't trust the well-tested 4k stacks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
> > > >
> > > > --- linux-2.6.15-rc5-mm3-full/arch/i386/Kconfig.debug.old       2006-01-04 11:43:55.000000000 +0100
> > > > +++ linux-2.6.15-rc5-mm3-full/arch/i386/Kconfig.debug   2006-01-04 11:44:14.000000000 +0100
> > > > @@ -53,8 +53,8 @@
> > > >           If in doubt, say "N".
> > > >
> > > >  config 4KSTACKS
> > > > -       bool "Use 4Kb for kernel stacks instead of 8Kb"
> > > > -       depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> > > > +       bool "Use 4Kb for kernel stacks instead of 8Kb" if DEBUG_KERNEL
> > >
> > > Why "if DEBUG_KERNEL" ?
> >
> > This is simply the same as before with the defaults inverted.
> >
> I just thought that you wanted to get as much testing in -mm as
> possible while still leaving the old stacksize option for those who
> don't yet trust 4K stacks.

That is what my patch does.

> To get maximum testing making 4KSTACKS default Y and removing the "if
> DEBUG_KERNEL" conditional just seems to me to be the obvious choice...

With my version, we are getting the bigger testing coverage - and 
getting a big testing coverage in -mm is what we need if we want to know 
whether we have really already fixed all stack problems or whether 
there are any left.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-04 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-04 14:51 [-mm patch] i386: enable 4k stacks by default Adrian Bunk
2006-01-04 16:39 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 16:44   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-04 16:49     ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 16:58       ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-01-04 17:10         ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 17:17           ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-04 21:56             ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 20:53 ` Grant Coady
2006-01-04 21:00   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-04 22:24     ` Grant Coady
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-05 17:54 Adrian Bunk
2006-01-14  2:09 Adrian Bunk
2007-04-28 19:19 Adrian Bunk
2007-04-28 21:18 ` Zan Lynx
2007-04-30  3:58   ` David Chinner
2007-04-30  8:17     ` Alan Cox
2007-04-30 10:26       ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-30 10:48         ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-30 12:13           ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-30 17:38             ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-30 18:22               ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-04-30 18:35                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-30 18:51               ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-30  8:55   ` Neil Brown
2007-04-30  8:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-30 11:30       ` Jens Axboe
2007-04-30 23:24         ` Neil Brown
2007-05-01  8:01           ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060104165835.GP3831@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox