From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] i386: enable 4k stacks by default
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:17:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060104171710.GQ3831@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490601040910q50655fc1sbdef48c8bd3d02d4@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:10:45PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 1/4/06, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:49:25PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > To get maximum testing making 4KSTACKS default Y and removing the "if
> > > DEBUG_KERNEL" conditional just seems to me to be the obvious choice...
> >
> > With my version, we are getting the bigger testing coverage - and
> > getting a big testing coverage in -mm is what we need if we want to know
> > whether we have really already fixed all stack problems or whether
> > there are any left.
> >
> Ok, I guess I didn't make myself as clear as I thought.
> What I meant was that if 4K stacks are always enabled by default, then
> you'll get more testing than if only people who enable DEBUG_KERNEL
> are able to turn it on.
>...
This is not what my patch does.
Please apply my patch, use DEBUG_KERNEL=n and you'll understand it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-04 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-04 14:51 [-mm patch] i386: enable 4k stacks by default Adrian Bunk
2006-01-04 16:39 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 16:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-04 16:49 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 16:58 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-04 17:10 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 17:17 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-01-04 21:56 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 20:53 ` Grant Coady
2006-01-04 21:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-04 22:24 ` Grant Coady
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-05 17:54 Adrian Bunk
2006-01-14 2:09 Adrian Bunk
2007-04-28 19:19 Adrian Bunk
2007-04-28 21:18 ` Zan Lynx
2007-04-30 3:58 ` David Chinner
2007-04-30 8:17 ` Alan Cox
2007-04-30 10:26 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-30 10:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-30 12:13 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-30 17:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-30 18:22 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-04-30 18:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-30 18:51 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-30 8:55 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-30 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-30 11:30 ` Jens Axboe
2007-04-30 23:24 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-01 8:01 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060104171710.GQ3831@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox