From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751824AbWADXPA (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:15:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751825AbWADXPA (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:15:00 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:16537 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751824AbWADXO7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:14:59 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:12:30 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Alistair John Strachan Cc: Nick Warne , "Randy.Dunlap" , Jesper Juhl , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, webmaster@kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.14.5 to 2.6.15 patch Message-ID: <20060104231226.GC14788@kroah.com> References: <200601041710.37648.nick@linicks.net> <200601042010.36208.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <20060104220157.GB12778@kroah.com> <200601042249.12116.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601042249.12116.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:49:11PM +0000, Alistair John Strachan wrote: > Re-read the thread. The confusion here is about "going back" to 2.6.14 before > patching 2.6.15. This has nothing to do with "rc kernels". We have this > documented explicitly in the kernel but not on the kernel.org FAQ. The kernel.org FAQ does not deal with Linux kernel specific things, only kernel.org specific things. So documenting it in the kernel itself is the proper place for it :) thanks, greg k-h